Answer:
One of the most common reasons that eminent domain cases are brought to court is over disputes about just compensation. The takings clause in the United States Constitution that established the government's power of eminent domain states
Explanation:
law is a kind of rule that is used in big society . like a city or country.
for example : city law
important note : do not use the word "law" for small societies like a family or a school!!
according to dictionary : law : the whole system of rules in a city or country that all of the people in that must obey .
Answer:
that is what I'm wondering!!! I clicks notification from brainly, boom, the question is gone
Answer:
1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.
2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
