Answer: Son's argument should fail
Explanation:
The son's defense will fail because the location of the easement is not governed by reasonableness as it had been established at its current location by the neighbor.
It can not now be changed arbitrarily by the son because the original owner had allowed it to be built. The easement's location is therefore established by actions between the original owner and the neighbor and so it is a binding location.
Answer:
The correct option is A, true
Explanation:
The predetermined overhead absorption rate is a forecast overhead rate usually computed by estimated total factory overhead by the planned usage or capacity of the unit of the activity.
This is more like planning ahead for the overhead to be incurred, hence the correct option is A , which truly supported that the statement made in the question
A. I went to fourth grade however, that was a long time ago
