1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
3 years ago
11

What did Churchill claim could have prevented Germany from takin In the second paragraph, what did Churchill claim could have pr

evented Germany
from taking the Sudetenland? Did he offer any evidence for this claim?g the Sudetenland? Did he offer any evidence for this claim?
History
2 answers:
givi [52]3 years ago
4 0

The self-evident truths in the second paragraph deal with natural rights. This includes that all men are created equal and have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

<span>What is the meaning of 'We hold these truths to be self evident'?This is the beginning of the most famous line from the Declaration of Independence. The writers of the Declaration are claiming that "all men are created equal" and "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights." When the term "self-evident" is used, it means that the human rights require no defense because their virtue is unquestionable.</span><span>Who wrote this document we hold these Truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal?Answer: Filippo Mazzei, a Tuscan physician, fought alongside Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry during the American Revolution. Mazzei drew up a plan to capture the British in New York by cutting off their sea escape, and convinced France to help the American colonists financially and militarily in their struggle against British rule. He also inspired the Jeffersonian phrase: "All men are created equal" when he wrote "All men are by nature equally free and independent." http://www.niaf.org/research/contribution.asp (from NAF)</span><span>What is the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence?The second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence is as follows:. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.. (Please note that the second paragraph is referred to as the "Preamble" to the Declaration. The first paragraph is called the "Introduction". This is confusing because the "Preamble" to the US Constitution is the first paragraph, not the second.)</span><span>What truths did the colonists say were self evident?
</span>
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: He claimed that if the United Kingdom had joined France in stopping Hitler instead of appeasing Germany, the results would have been different.

Explanation: He meant that Hitler was being appeased by the Prime Minister of Britain and by France because they allowed Hitler to break the treaty of Versailles and take Austria, the Suderland, Czechoslovakia and, eventually, some of Poland.

You might be interested in
1. How might parents respond to discussions and concerns about their children​
lianna [129]
They could get mad or confused it really depends on what the concerns are about the children
7 0
2 years ago
What can historians learn from archeological evidence?
kumpel [21]

Answer:

artifacts and features to learn how people lived in specific times and places.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Why was the year 1492 so important to Spanish history?
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

this is so important to hispanic culture because that is when they brought htere culture to latin america and the carribeans.

Explanation:

what it sways on the internet The year 1492 is an important date for Spain as a whole, but especially in the small, luscious city of Granada. ... As a result, these conquests brought both the Spanish language and culture to Latin America and the Caribbean as well as pumped economic wealth into Spain.

7 0
3 years ago
Scarcity indicates that a price is too low.<br><br> TRUE<br><br> FALSE
Julli [10]
True the answer is true

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lady Capulet thinks that Juliet weeps because of Tybalt’s death and tries to comfort her telling her that they will have “vengea
Natalija [7]

You can't really justify anything but dramatic irony.

It isn't foreshadowing. She is genuinely weeping and it has nothing to do with future events

There is no allusion in this. Her crying is not symbolic. Nor does it refer back to anything

An oxymoron is a contradiction that seems false or unrelated but isn't. Her weeping is genuine. You might be able to make a case for this but dramatic irony is much better: Juliet's mother thinks one thing, the audience knows another.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does the trial by jury protect a citizens freedom?
    12·1 answer
  • How did China impact the growth and development of japan
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true about the South after the war?
    12·1 answer
  • What event led to racial tensions during the summer of 1919?
    15·1 answer
  • The Magna Carta was important in English history because it:
    11·1 answer
  • The state in which there was constant rebellion during Philip II's reign was.....
    6·1 answer
  • What's the name of the african american that did not give up the seat in a bus in December 1, 1955
    7·2 answers
  • What is the idea that authority rests both with the national and the state government?
    12·2 answers
  • What was the official title of George Washington during the American Revolution?​
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of a household budget? A) Essential expenses should be reduced. B) Interest should not be calculated as
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!