1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
3 years ago
11

What did Churchill claim could have prevented Germany from takin In the second paragraph, what did Churchill claim could have pr

evented Germany
from taking the Sudetenland? Did he offer any evidence for this claim?g the Sudetenland? Did he offer any evidence for this claim?
History
2 answers:
givi [52]3 years ago
4 0

The self-evident truths in the second paragraph deal with natural rights. This includes that all men are created equal and have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

<span>What is the meaning of 'We hold these truths to be self evident'?This is the beginning of the most famous line from the Declaration of Independence. The writers of the Declaration are claiming that "all men are created equal" and "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights." When the term "self-evident" is used, it means that the human rights require no defense because their virtue is unquestionable.</span><span>Who wrote this document we hold these Truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal?Answer: Filippo Mazzei, a Tuscan physician, fought alongside Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry during the American Revolution. Mazzei drew up a plan to capture the British in New York by cutting off their sea escape, and convinced France to help the American colonists financially and militarily in their struggle against British rule. He also inspired the Jeffersonian phrase: "All men are created equal" when he wrote "All men are by nature equally free and independent." http://www.niaf.org/research/contribution.asp (from NAF)</span><span>What is the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence?The second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence is as follows:. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.. (Please note that the second paragraph is referred to as the "Preamble" to the Declaration. The first paragraph is called the "Introduction". This is confusing because the "Preamble" to the US Constitution is the first paragraph, not the second.)</span><span>What truths did the colonists say were self evident?
</span>
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: He claimed that if the United Kingdom had joined France in stopping Hitler instead of appeasing Germany, the results would have been different.

Explanation: He meant that Hitler was being appeased by the Prime Minister of Britain and by France because they allowed Hitler to break the treaty of Versailles and take Austria, the Suderland, Czechoslovakia and, eventually, some of Poland.

You might be interested in
Explain the impact World War I had on the women who were left home, and the men who were in the trenches.
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The impact World War I had on the women who were left home and the men who were in the trenches was devastating in different ways.

First, if men were drafted, they had to leave home to enlist in the military. That was the first shock. Most of them knew they were going to die on the battlefield.

That impacted the family in that women, mothers, had to be in charge of the house, raise children, get a job to feed the family members, knowing that they could never see again their husbands. That should have been a traumatic experience.

Children! How a mother could explain to children that their dad was not going to get back home. Too much pain and suffereing.

7 0
3 years ago
What were the main policy objectives of the republican and american parties?
prisoha [69]
Republican celebration antagonistic slavery and argued to force down the wages of loose employees and degraded the distinction of manual labor. They praised a society based on "the middling lessons who own the soil and paintings it with their personal hands."
American birthday celebration -Anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic origins -wanted to: -Unite native-born Protestants in opposition to Irish, and German Catholics -prohibit similarly immigration
3 0
3 years ago
What was the outcome of the war important for american colonist ?
myrzilka [38]
Assuming you're referring to the "French and Indian War", the outcome was significant since it led to the British heavily taxing the colonists in order to pay for the war (which they won), which led to the American Revolution. 
3 0
3 years ago
World war 1 cause and effect
AveGali [126]
´´The M.A.I.N. causes of world war 1 were Militarism, secret Alliances, Imperialism and Nationalism .The driving force was Nationalism ... The igniting incident of  the ´´Great WAR´´ was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungerian Empire, in Bosnia by a serbian nationalist.
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the native Americans feel so strong about the battle of Custer’s Last Stand
Komok [63]
Because he tried pushing them out but got killed and the natives pushed out the rest of his men the irony tho
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ralph Nader's book Unsafe at Any Speed brought about safety regulations in what products?
    5·1 answer
  • A map that includes three different maps: one of all of Europe, one of Germany, and another with only Berlin. On the left, the H
    14·1 answer
  • Which event led to the formation of the NAACP?
    13·1 answer
  • Intel, a company formed in 1968, revolutionized computers by combining several integrated circuits that contained both memory an
    13·1 answer
  • A series of legislative acts passed under the Grant administration in 1870 and 1871 authorized federal protection for black suff
    13·1 answer
  • Each branch balances eachother​
    11·1 answer
  • When a President rejects a bill this is called?
    9·1 answer
  • sad..................................................but...............................................happy????????????????????
    8·2 answers
  • In free market economies, businesses make things like cars, not to do good for mankind but because they want to make a ?
    11·1 answer
  • In 1824, Mexico became
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!