Answer:
A. The British and French decision to give into aggression in order to keep peace
Explanation:
Aung San Suu Kyi is considered to be a very brave human being because <u>she </u><u>stood </u><u>against the </u><u>military dictatorship </u><u>of </u><u>Myanmar</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Aung San Suu Kyi </h3>
- Opposed the military government of Myanmar.
- Became part of the civilian government of Myanmar.
Aung San Suu Kyi braved arrest, detention, and death threats from the military to keep struggling against them all the while calling for nonviolent protests.
In conclusion, Aung San Suu Kyi can be said to be very courageous because she refused to back down and yet never called for violence.
Find out more on Aung San Suu Kyi at brainly.com/question/1253510.
The women's suffrage movement was a decades-long fight to win the right to vote for women in the United States. It took activists and reformers nearly 100 years to win that right, and the campaign was not easy: Disagreements over strategy threatened to cripple the movement more than once.
The Seneca Falls Convention was the first women's rights convention in the United States. Held in July 1848 in Seneca Falls, New York, the meeting launched the women's suffrage movement, which more than seven decades later ensured women the right to vote.
On this day in 1850, the first national convention for woman's rights concluded in Worcester. ... Speakers, most of them women, demanded the right to vote, to own property, to be admitted to higher education, medicine, the ministry, and other professions. Many newspaper reporters heaped scorn on the convention.
First held in 1850 in Worcester, Massachusetts, the National Women's Rights Convention combined both female and male leadership and attracted a wide base of support including temperance advocates and abolitionists.
Taking into account the original statement: "Based on the information in the charts, which of the following conclusions can you draw?"
A. The Court by its actions is creating more law than the Congress.
B. The results in the graphs stem from the Senate's reluctance to confirm judicial nominees.
C. The Court overturns laws more often than it follows stare decisis.
D. The court has issued more conservative rulings when it overturns prior Court precedents.
The answer is: D.
Hope this helps.