1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
barxatty [35]
3 years ago
11

describe historical, social, political, and economic processes producing diversity, equality, and structured inequalities in the

U.S.;
Social Studies
1 answer:
tamaranim1 [39]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Rising inequality is one of our most pressing social concerns. And it is not simply that some are advantaged while others are not, but that structures of inequality are self-reinforcing and cumulative; they become durable. The societal arrangements that in the past have produced more equal economic outcomes and social opportunities – such as expanded mass education, access to social citizenship and its benefits, and wealth redistribution – have often been attenuated and supplanted by processes that are instead inequality-inducing. This issue of Dædalus draws on a wide range of expertise to better understand and examine how economic conditions are linked, across time and levels of analysis, to other social, psychological, political, and cultural processes that can either counteract or reinforce durable inequalities.  

Inequality Generation & Persistence as Multidimensional Processes: An Interdisciplinary Agenda  

The Rise of Opportunity Markets: How Did It Happen & What Can We Do?  

We describe the rise of “opportunity markets” that allow well-off parents to buy opportunity for their children. Although parents cannot directly buy a middle-class outcome for their children, they can buy opportunity indirectly through advantaged access to the schools, neighborhoods, and information that create merit and raise the probability of a middle-class outcome. The rise of opportunity markets happened so gradually that the country has seemingly forgotten that opportunity was not always sold on the market. If the United States were to recommit to equalizing opportunities, this could be pursued by dismantling opportunity markets, by providing low-income parents with the means to participate in them, or by allocating educational opportunities via separate competitions among parents of similar means. The latter approach, which we focus upon here, would not require mobilizing support for a massive re-distributive project.  

The Difficulties of Combating Inequality in Time  

Scholars have argued that disadvantaged groups face an impossible choice in their efforts to win policies capable of diminishing inequality: whether to emphasize their sameness to or difference from the advantaged group. We analyze three cases from the 1980s and 1990s in which reformers sought to avoid that dilemma and assert groups’ sameness and difference in novel ways: in U.S. policy on biomedical research, in the European Union’s initiatives on gender equality, and in Canadian law on Indigenous rights. In each case, however, the reforms adopted ultimately reproduced the sameness/difference dilemma rather than transcended it.  

Political Inequality, “Real” Public Preferences, Historical Comparisons & Axes of Disadvantage  

The essays in this issue of Dædalus raise fascinating and urgent questions about inequality, time, and interdisciplinary research. They lead me to ask further questions about the public’s commitment to reducing inequality, the importance of political power in explaining and reducing social and economic inequities, and the possible incommensurability of activists’ and policy-makers’ vantage points or job descriptions.  

New Angles on Inequality  

The trenchant essays in this volume pose two critical questions with respect to inequality: First, what explains the eruption of nationalist, xenophobic, and far-right politics and the ability of extremists to gain a toehold in the political arena that is greater than at any time since World War II? Second, how did the social distance between the haves and have-not harden into geographic separation that makes it increasingly difficult for those attempting to secure jobs, housing, and mobility-ensuring schools to break through? The answers are insightful and unsettling, particularly when the conversation turns to an action agenda. Every move in the direction of alternatives is fraught because the histories that brought each group of victims to occupy their uncomfortable niche in the stratification order excludes some who should be included or ignores a difference that matters in favor of principles of equal treatment.  

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Quote from the Magna Carta and Explanation for the Quote
kherson [118]

Answer/Explanation:

We have also granted to all free men of Our kingdom ... all the liberties underwritten ... of Us and Our heirs.  

<em>Sets out the purpose of the following agreements and declarations. It is to be a binding agreement in which the king grants certain liberties to "to all free men" of the kingdom. The king also makes the Magna Carta binding on his own heirs.</em>

<em />

Covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic.

<em>A civil body politic is just an organized group of citizens with its own laws and government. In describing the formation of this group as a covenant, the drafters of the compact evoke the biblical covenant made between God and the Israelites in the Old Testament. The dual nature of their agreement religious covenant and political combination—reflects the dual nature of Plymouth Colony itself.</em>

<em />

That election of members of Parliament ought to be free…That for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, Parliaments ought to be held frequently.

<em>Guaranteed free elections and frequent meetings of Parliament </em>

A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right.  

<em>Most colonists, including colonial leaders Samuel Adams and Thomas Jefferson, weren't even considering separating from Great Britain at the time Common Sense was published in early 1776. Paine used his pamphlet not only to explain his reasoning for American independence but also to convince the reader to accept his ideas. He wants them to look beyond the popular and accepted ideas of the time and search their souls for what is truly right.</em>

Have a nice day and mark me brainliest! :)

8 0
3 years ago
Homeowners may transfer the soh benefit to a subsequent home. in order to do this, their homestead exemption must have been in p
mixas84 [53]

Homeowners may transfer the soh benefit to a subsequent home. in order to do this, their homestead exemption must have been in place on their current home for $500,000 preceding years.

Homesteading is a life-style of self-sufficiency. it's far characterized through subsistence agriculture, domestic renovation of meals, and can additionally involve the small scale manufacturing of textiles, apparel, and craft work for household use or sale.

Abode is described as a residence and the land surrounding it. A own family farm is an example of a abode. A tract of public land (a hundred and sixty acres by way of the domicile Act of 1862) granted with the aid of the U.S. authorities to a settler to be advanced as a farm.

A homestead is a residence and surrounding land owned through a family — frequently, it includes a farmhouse. most of the people have houses, however not anybody has a home: that means your circle of relatives owns greater than a house. The dwelling house frequently includes a farmhouse and land dedicated to vegetation or animals.

Learn more about homestead  here:

brainly.com/question/842165

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
&lt; Exit
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which racial or ethnic category has the largest number of
bulgar [2K]
The answer is D hope I helped
5 0
3 years ago
Read the following excerpt from Federalist #3 by John Jay.
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The Federalists believed in the formation of a strong central government, thinking a central government would help to unify the nation and address issues of war or conflict in a way that protects the people. A strong national government will help to ensure the effectiveness of military, foreign diplomacy and national reputation. One unified government is more effective than 13 (now 50) separate state governments attempting to coexist peacefully, also this would eliminate states declaring war on each other (then the civil war happened sooo that's that)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLZZZZZZZZZZZ HELP ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • Evolution is a A. variable because it is a factor that can be changed during experimentation. B. theory because it is an explana
    8·1 answer
  • Explain how to effectively care for children and young people's skin, hair and teeth
    5·1 answer
  • Adam Smith suggested that an invisible had guides market economies. In this analogy, what is the baton that the invisible hand u
    7·1 answer
  • What was the result of farmers protesting the whiskey tax in 1794?
    11·2 answers
  • why do you think it is impotant for all of you to learn about whom you can go for your own needs and the needs of your family?​
    14·1 answer
  • What did Southerners fear would happen if Black people were given rights equal to those of whites?
    13·1 answer
  • Ms. Kahill has paired up first-grade students with kindergarten students who are struggling with printing clear letters. She bel
    8·1 answer
  • Why is it important that some restrictions be placed on civil liberties and civil rights
    6·1 answer
  • Which measure of validity is based on showing a substantial correlation between test scores and job performance scores
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!