Answer: the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than other producers
Explanation: In other to clearly understand or grasp the definition or meaning of comparative advantage, the term opportunity cost should be understood. Opportunity cost simply means the benefit which one forfeits or losses when one chooses a certain option over the other. Comparative advantage is possessed by a certain seller or economy who is capable of selling his goods at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. Thus, the comparative advantages weighs the size or amount of benefit forfeited or lost by sellers as a result of selling at a lower price. Thus the lower the opportunity cost, the better the comparative advantage.
Answer: it would have cost, more money for the employees and about 70% buy at least on whole food per trip. ( so sorry if this does make sense)
Explanation:
Answer & Explanation:
a). The contract between Lisa and Bob is valid and enforceable as a valid contract is an agreement between parties lacking no element. The contract was very detailed and well discussed regardless of Bob drinking it is still enforceable unless Bob can proof that the intoxication impaired his judgement and made him incompetent to sign the contract thereby making it void.
b). The contract will be valid if Bob signed it before the drinks arrived as the document was complete and his signature show acceptance of the terms of the contract.
c). A minor can not enter into a contract as they may lack the capacity to enter into a valid contract. As such, if Bob was a minor regardless of him being sober any contract signed by him can be completely voidable.
