Answer:
C. The write-off of receivables by personnel who receive cash permits the misappropriation of cash.
Answer:
expansion should be undertaken as it has a positive net present value
Explanation:
It is necessary for companies to develop a strategic business plan, which contains the action plans necessary for an organization to achieve its objectives and goals.
The organization's strategic planning will comprise long-term objectives, including the company's guidelines, its mission, vision and values, the analysis of internal and external environments, and action plans, which will help the company to be well positioned, profitable and competitive in the market.
The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
Answer:
19%
Explanation:
Given that,
Nominal GDP in 2010 = $200 billion
Nominal GDP in 2009 = $180 billion
GDP deflator in 2010 = 125
GDP deflator in 2009 = 105
Percentage change in prices:
= Percentage change in GDP deflator
= (Change in GDP deflator ÷ GDP deflator in 2009) × 100
= [(125 - 105) ÷ 105] × 100
= (20 ÷ 105) × 100
= 0.19 × 100
= 19%
Therefore, the prices increases by 19%.
