Answer:
There is no sufficient evidence to reject the company's claim at the significance level of 0.05
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
be the true mean weight per apple the company ship. We want to test the next hypothesis
vs
(two-tailed test).
Because we have a large sample of size n = 49 apples randomly selected from a shipment, the test statistic is given by
which is normally distributed. The observed value is
. The rejection region for
is given by RR = {z| z < -1.96 or z > 1.96} where the area below -1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025; and the area above 1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025 as well. Because the observed value 1.4583 does not fall inside the rejection region RR, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Answer:
You can proceed as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
First solve the quadratic inequality
. To do that, factorize, then we have that
. This implies that

or

In the first case the solution is the empty set
. In the second case the solution is the interval
. Now we have that
![A=[1,4]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%5B1%2C4%5D)

.
To show that
consider
. Then
, this implies that
, then
. Now, to show that
consider
, then
, then
, then
, this implies that
.
Observe the image below.
Answer:
128
Step-by-step explanation:
If you multiply you get it.
a)
n years =$125000+($125000×6.5%)×n
b)
$125000+($125000×6.5%)×23
=???