A speaker's credibility is affected by two primary factors-competence and character.
<h3>What is
factors-competence?</h3>
Following on from the preceding explanation, three elements influence students' competence, which will be investigated further. Teachers' instructional performance, students' learning satisfaction, and accomplishment motivation are among these aspects.
Competence is defined as your talent or aptitude in a particular field or subject, or being able to perform something well or being sane enough to face trial in court. A pianist's ability to play the piano skillfully is an example of competence.
Affective social competency is defined as effective communication of one's own affect, successful understanding and response to others' affective communications, and awareness, acceptance, and regulation of one's own affect.
To know more about factors-competence follow the link:
brainly.com/question/2014737
#SPJ4
Answer:
four years old
Explanation:
Roberta and her peers are most likely four years old. Most children tend to recognize and label stereotypical gender groups at about 2 years of age and at 3 years they are able to recognize their own gender and at age 3 to 4 years they use gender labels quite consistently. However, at age 5 and 6 children become rigid about gender stereotypes and preferences. Roberta and her classmates are likely 4 years of age.
Crusoe starts his monologue by looking at his life on the island and his presentation to the nature encompassing him to his experience as a prisoner. He guarantees that the state of living makes him be his very own prisoner mind, calling it "a uninhabited wild, without reclamation." This announcement denotes a parallel between nature and the jail of his past, demonstrating that he is as yet not genuinely free. By utilizing dejected expressions to depict the "anguish of my soul" and "my extremely heard would die inside me," Crusoe builds up a claustrophobic and struggled tone, requiring the reader to partake in his mope as he portrays life on the island. This tone is additionally worked with the rundown of areas encompassing him, snowballing into madness.
The Hamburg Massacre (or Red Shirt Massacre or Hamburg riot) was a key event in the African American town of Hamburg, South Carolina in July 1876, leading up to the last election season of the Reconstruction Era. It was the first of a series of civil disturbances planned and carried out by white Democrats in the majority-black Republican Edgefield District, with the goal of suppressing black voting, disrupting Republican meetings, and suppressing black Americans civil rights, through actual and threatened violence.[1]
Beginning with a dispute over free passage on a public road, the massacre was rooted in racial hatred and political motives. A court hearing attracted armed white "rifle clubs," colloquially called the "Red Shirts". Desiring to regain control of state governments and eradicate the civil rights of black Americans, over 100 white men attacked about 30 black servicemen of the National Guard at the armory, killing two as they tried to leave that night. Later that night, the Red Shirts tortured and murdered four of the militia while holding them as prisoners, and wounded several others. In total, the events in Hamburg resulted in the death of one white man and six black men with several more blacks being wounded. Although 94 white men were indicted for murder by a coroner's jury, none were prosecuted.
The events were a catalyst in the overarching violence in the volatile 1876 election campaign. There were other episodes of violence in the months before the election, including an estimated 100 blacks killed during several days in Ellenton, South Carolina, also in Aiken County. The Southern Democrats succeeded in "redeeming" the state government and electing Wade Hampton III as governor. During the remainder of the century, they passed laws to establish single-party white rule, impose legal segregation and "Jim Crow," and disenfranchise blacks with a new state constitution adopted in 1895. This exclusion of blacks from the political system was effectively maintained into the late 1960s.
