Answer uwu <3:
A dispute between President Harry S. Truman and General Douglas MacArthur in 1951, during the Korean War. MacArthur, who commanded the troops of the United Nations, wanted to use American air power to attack the People's Republic of China. Truman refused, fearing that an American attack on China would bring the Soviet Union into the war. When MacArthur criticized Truman's decision publicly, Truman declared MacArthur insubordinate and removed him as commanding general. MacArthur returned to the United States, received a hero's welcome, and told Congress. “Old soldiers never die, they only fade away.”
The economy operates according to the law of supply and demand for goods and services. According to this theory, the interaction between supply and demand for a good or service fits and the vector of adjustment is price.
If the price is high, there is more supply than demand. If the price is low, there is more demand than supply. If demand increases, price increases and supply increases. If demand falls, the price falls. That is, the price makes the interaction. There will be a moment where the quantity offered is exactly equal to the quantity demanded, at which point the price practiced is the equilibrium price.
So if an economy is in equilibrium at a time and then the price charged is higher than the equilibrium price, it means that demand has gotten higher than supply.
<u>However, none of the alternatives would explain why a price is charged above the equilibrium price.</u> <u>The answer is the reverse of what is written in alternative (A)</u>. The truth is this: As the quantity demanded rises, the price rises above the equilibrium price. <u>This is the answer</u>.
The alternative (B) is true, although it does not answer the question of the problem. If prices rise, demand falls. This is because the high price discourages consumption.
BTW, I'm an economist and I'm sure.
Answer:
Reincarnation in Buddhism is the transmigration of a soul to another body after death.
Explanation:
For example they believe that if u die u reincarnate or in another
Supporters of the youthful dissidents saluted the Court choice that "understudies are qualified for opportunity of articulation of their
sees." Critics who contradicted the wearing of the armbands anticipated hurtful outcomes.
Equity Hugo Black disagreed from the dominant part assessment. He recommended that the Court's choice was "the start of a
new progressive time of tolerance in this nation encouraged by the legal." He contended that nobody has a total
appropriate to the right to speak freely and articulation.
Later choices, for example,
Bethel School District
v.
Fraser
(1986) and
Hazelwood School District
v.
Kuhlmeier
(1988),
limited
understudies' First Amendment rights. These
decisions by their inclination likewise extended the specialist of school authorities.
Its 1 Americans should speak in favor of neutrality.
4 It is important for every American to have the same spirit.