We will have the following:
First, we have that the problem can be seeing as follows:
Now, knowing this and the the properties of the diagonals we will have that [We use the law of cosines}:
First diagonal [AC} is given by:

So, one of the diagonals has an approximate length of 10.7 ft.
Second diagonal [BD] is given by:

So, the second diagonal has a length of approximately 28.1 ft.
<em>**Diagonals**</em>
Y=-4 is linear, anything not linear would be a quadratic in this instance
A) See picture for the table.
To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.
B)
Hypothesis:
H0: No association between employment and diabetes.
H1: Association between the two
Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.
Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.
The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001
With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.
C)
Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%
Answer:8(1/2x - 1/4)> 12 - 2x
a.x > 7
b.x > 7/3
c.x > 5/3
d.x > 5/3
Step-by-step explanation: Solve the inequality 12(1/2x-1/3)>8-2x