Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": changing the culture through diversity training education programs.
Explanation:
Boosting diversity at the workplace is an activity that mainly relies on the representatives of the Human Resources (HR) Department. They are in charge of recruiting and selecting the applicants that will be part of the institution based on their capabilities and expertise. Thus, HR representatives could promote the selection of different individuals from different ages, races, gender, ethnicity, and nationality, without preferring one or another, so the working environment will be diversified and the company can take advantage of the different backgrounds of those new hires.
Therefore, <em>training other employees could improve the understanding of other employees on dealing with workers different than them but this does not foster diversity in the workplace.</em>
Answer:
$ 210 million
Explanation:
Data provided :
Taxable income for the current year = $ 300 million
Tax rate of the income = 40%
therefore, the income tax for the current year = 0.40 × $ 300 million
or
the income tax for the current year = $ 120 million
Decrease in the deferred tax assets = $ 30 million
Increase in the deferred tax liabilities = $ 60 million
Hence,
the total income tax expense for the year
= $ 120 million + $ 30 million + $ 60 million
or
= $ 210 million
Answer: Option D
Explanation: In simple words, targeting strategy refers to the strategy in which company selects their potential customers. These companies directs their marketing strategy to impact and impress only those selected customer group.
These organisations usually end up being the pioneer of their industry, specializing in that market segment. For example- roles targets the elite class of the society for their products.
Answer:
A. $230,400
Explanation:
600,000 x 40% = 240,000
260,000 - 156,000 = 104,000 transfers of goods intra-entity at sale price
we divide by the markup to know the cost:
104,000 / 1.3 = 80,000 cost of the goods
gross margin 104,000 - 80,000 = 24,000
we will eliminate 40% of the gross margin
24,000 x 40% = 9,600
This amount will be eliminate from the incoem statemnet:
240,000 - 9,600 = 230,400
Answer: She is not.
Explanation:
It would seem as though that Mary got into a type of contract known as an Option Contract or more precisely, a Call Option Contract simply called a Call.
In this type on contract, a seller gives a buyer the right to buy a good or service at a certain price within a set period.
Mary agreed to sell the rare Chinese Art for a certain amount which Mike could not pay but she promised to give him 3 weeks to take it within which he can pay and collect the item.
Mike returned in 2 weeks which was within the range of time allowed and so she should have kept the offer open for the time she said she would.
She is wrong to believe that all she owes him is his down payment. She broke a contract.
