Need help can u help me

Tonya and Pearl each completed a separate proof to show that alternate interior angles AKL and FLK are congruent. Who completed

zalisa [80]

Answer:

Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.

But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.

The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation

8 0

1 year ago

Graph the image of square CDEF after a reflection across the x-axis

Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

If you have a general point (x, y), and you reflect it across the x-axis, the coordinates of the new point will be:

(x,-y)

So we only change the sign of the y-component.

Now, if we do a reflection across the x-axis of a whole figure, then we apply the reflection to all the points that make the figure.

Then, we could just apply the reflection to the vertices of the square, then graph the new vertices, and then connect them, that is equivalent to graph the image of the square after the reflection.

The original vertices are:

C = (-3, 7)

D = (0, 7)

E = (0, 10)

F = (-3, 10)

Now we apply the reflection, remember that this only changes the sign of the y-component, then the new vertices are:

C' = (-3, -7)

D' = (0, -7)

E' = (0, - 10)

F' = (0, - 10)

Now we need to graph these points and connect them to get the reflected figure, the image can be seen below.