I'm going with B! I would say it is the right answer
Answer is A.... its designed to regulate colonial trade and enabled England to collect duties (taxes) in the Colonies. American Colonies Index.
One way in which nation states can support terrorism is by actively funding it by supplying money and weapons. Another way is to "turn a blind eye" and pretend that they don't know what is going on.
Well even though im not gigivng you the two paragraphs you need, I can give you information on two of the cases so that you can write about them: <span>McCulloch vs. Maryland: "The power to tax equals the power to destroy" -- The state of Maryland attempted to tax the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States (federally-created) -- Confirmed the legitimacy (in Marshall's opinion) of the Bank of the United States, thus upholding Congress' use of the elastic clause. Also further emphasized Article VI (Supremacy Clause) that the states had no power to tax a federal institution. Clearly defining that federal law/power trumps state.
Gibbons vs. Ogden: Federally issued permit vs. State (NY) issued permit to navigate waterways around New York. Marshall court re-emphasized Article VI (Supremacy) stating that federal law trumps state AND this decision further emphasized the Commerce Clause stating that commerce was not defined solely as the buying and selling of goods, but the transportation thereof as well. Establishing that only the national Congress had the ability to regulate INTERstate trade, further strengthening the federal government over the states. Hope this works for you.</span>
