All categories

3 years ago

What is a motive?

Business

2 answers:

lakkis [162]3 years ago

6 0

The answer is A! lmk if this helped (:

Licemer1 [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A: A reason for doing something

You might be interested in

g A company is evaluating a project requiring an initial cash outflow of $2 million. The investment will generate cash flows for

QveST [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

NPV of first option = - 2 + 1 / 1.1 + 1 / 1.1² + 1 / 1.1³ + 1 / 1.1⁴ + 1 / 1.1⁵

= -2 + .909 + .826+ .751+.683+ .620 = $1.789

NPV of the second option :--

NPV when annual cash flow is 1.5 million

-2 / 1.1 + 1.5 /1.1² + 1.5/1.1³ + 1.5 / 1.1⁴ + 1.5 / 1.1⁵ + 1.5 / 1.1⁶

= -1.818 + 1.239 + 1.127+1.024+.931+.846

= -1.818 + 5.167

= 3.349

NPV when annual cash flow is 0.5 million

-2 / 1.1 + .5 /1.1² + .5/1.1³ + .5 / 1.1⁴ + .5 / 1.1⁵ + .5 / 1.1⁶

= - 1.818 + 1.722 = $ -0 .096

NPV = .65 x 3.349 - .35 x .096

= 2.177 - .0336

= $2.1434

value of option wait = $2.1434 - $1.789

= $ 0.3544

5 0

3 years ago

Mountain Top Markets has total assets of $48,700, net working capital of $1,100, and retained earnings of $21,200. The firm has

spin [16.1K]

Answer: 2.63

Explanation:

The Market to Book ratio is also referred to as the price to book ratio. It is a financial evaluation of the market value of a company relative to its book value. It should be noted that the market value is current stock price of every outstanding shares that the company has while the book value is the amount that the company will have left after its assets have been liquidated and all liabilities have been repaid.

The market-to-book ratio will be the market price per share divided by the book value. It should be noted that the book value per share is the net worth of the business divided by the number of outstanding shares. The book value will be:

= [(12500 ×1) + $21200]/12500

= ($12500 + $21200)/$12500

= $33700/12500

=$2.70

The market-to-book ratio will now be:

= $7.10/$2.70

=2.63

6 0

3 years ago

QRT Co. received $1,560 advance from Zync Inc. as rent for the use of a building owned by QRT Co. How does this transaction affe

Serhud [2]

Answer:

a.Cash is increased, and unearned rent is increased.

Explanation:

Since in the question, it is mentioned that QRT Co. received $1,560 advance from Zync Inc. for the building use.

We know that the cash is received which increases the cash balance but the service is not provided so it would become a liability and recorded as unearned rent.

The unearned rent is increased which show under the current liability side of the balance sheet

Hence, both cash and unearned rent is increased

7 0

3 years ago

Show that the set of vectors {(−4,1,3),(5,1,6),(6,0,2)} does not span R 3 , but that it does span the subspace of R 3 consisting

Alika [10]

Answer:

The vectors does not span R3 and only span a subspace of R3 which satisfies x+13y-3z=0

Explanation:

The vectors are given as

$v_1=\left[\begin{array}{c}-4&1&3\end{array}\right] \\v_2=\left[\begin{array}{c}-5&1&6\end{array}\right] \\v_3=\left[\begin{array}{c}6&0&2\end{array}\right]$

Now if the vectors would span the $R^3$ , the rank of the consolidated matrix will be 3 if it is not 3 this indicates that the vectors does not span the $R^3$ .

So the matrix is given as

$M=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}v_1&v_2&v_3\end{array}\right] \\M=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&5&6\\1&1&0\\3&6&2\end{array}\right]\\$

In order to calculate the rank, the matrix is reduced to the Row Echelon form as

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&5&6\\ 0&\frac{9}{4}&\frac{3}{2}\\ 3&6&2\end{array}\right] R_2 \rightarrow R_2+\frac{R_1}{4}$

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&5&6\\ 0&\frac{9}{4}&\frac{3}{2}\\ 0&\frac{39}{4}&\frac{13}{2}\end{array}\right] R_3 \rightarrow R_3+\frac{3R_1}{4}\\$

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&5&6\\ 0&\frac{39}{4}&\frac{13}{2\\ 0&\frac{9}{4}&\frac{3}{2}}\end{array}\right] R_2\:\leftrightarrow \:R_3$

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&5&6\\ 0&\frac{39}{4}&\frac{13}{2}\\ 0&0&0\end{array}\right] R_3 \rightarrow R_3-\frac{3R_2}{13}\\$

As the Rank is given as number of non-zero rows in the Row echelon form which are 2 so the rank is 2.

Thus this indicates that the vectors does not span $R^3$

Now for any vector the corresponding equation is formulated by using the combined matrix which is given as for any arbitrary vector and the coordinate as

$v=\left[\begin{array}{c}x&y&z\end{array}\right]$

$c=\left[\begin{array}{c}c_1&c_2&c_3\end{array}\right]$

$Mc=v$

$\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-4&5&6\\1&1&0\\3&6&2\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}c_1&c_2&c_3\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c}x&y&z\end{array}\right]$

$M=\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}v_1&v_2&v_3& | &v\end{array}\right] \\M=\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}-4&5&6&|&x\\1&1&0&|&y\\3&6&2&|&z\end{array}\right]\\$

Now converting the combined matrix as

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccccc}-4&5&6&|&x\\ 0&\frac{9}{4}&\frac{3}{2}&|&\frac{4y+x}{4}\\ 3&6&2&|&z\end{array}\right] R_2 \rightarrow R_2+\frac{R_1}{4}\\$

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccccc}-4&5&6&|&x\\ 0&\frac{9}{4}&\frac{3}{2}&|&\frac{4y+x}{4}\\ 0&\frac{39}{4}&\frac{13}{2}&|&\frac{4z+3x}{4}\end{array}\right] R_3 \rightarrow R_3+\frac{3R_1}{4}\\$

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccccc}-4&5&6&|&x\\ 0&\frac{39}{4}&\frac{13}{2}&|&\frac{4z+3x}{4}\\ 0&\frac{9}{4}&\frac{3}{2}&|&\frac{4y+x}{4}\end{array}\right] R_3 \leftrightarrow R_2\\$

$\approx \left[\begin{array}{ccccc}-4&5&6&|&x\\ 0&\frac{39}{4}&\frac{13}{2}&|&\frac{4z+3x}{4}\\ 0&0&0&|&\frac{13y+x-3z}{13}\end{array}\right] R_3 \rightarrow R_3-\frac{3R_2}{13}\\$

From this it is seen that whatever the values of the coordinates does not effect the value of the plane with equation as

$\frac{13y+x-3z}{13}=0\\or\\13y+x-3z=0\\$

So it is verified that the subspace of R3 such that it satisfies x+13y-3z=0 consists of all vectors.

6 0

3 years ago

g Ron and Dena own the only two profit maximizing sandwich shops in town. Both Ron and Dena are trying to decide whether or not

algol13

Remainder part of Question:

Dena

Advertising Don't Advertise

Ron Advertising ($X, $400) ($300, $425)

Don't Advertise ($400, $100) ($350, $Y)

Answer:

Part A. Don't Advertise" is a dominant strategy only for Ron if the value of X is below $400.

Part B. "Don't advertise" is a dominant strategy only for Dena if the value of Y is below $100.

Explanation:

If Dena is desiring to opt to "Advertising", then Ron will only have more pay off in choosing "Don't advertise" if the X is below $400.

On the other hand, if Dena is desiring to opt "Don't Advertise", then Ron will only have more pay off in choosing "Don't advertise" if again X is below $400.

This means that the "Don't Advertise" is a dominant strategy only for Ron if the value of X is below $400.

Similarly, if Ron desires to opt "Advertising", then Dena will only have more pay off in choosing "Don't advertise" if the value of Y is below $100.

On the other hand, if Ron is desiring to opt "Don't Advertise", then Dena will only have more pay off in choosing "Don't advertise" if the value of Y is below $100.

This means that the "Don't advertise" is a dominant strategy only for Dena if the value of Y is below $100.

8 0

4 years ago