<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
<u>
Answer:1</u> The total annual cash inflows associated with the new machine for capital budgeting purposes is:
=$10000
<u>Answer:2 </u>The internal rate of return promised by the new machine to the nearest whole percent is:
Particulars Year Amount ($)
Cash outflow 0 -40000
Cash inflow 1 10000
2 10000
3 10000
4 10000
5 10000
6 10000
IRR 13%
=13% using IRR function in excel.
<u>Answer:3</u> IRR=17%
with salvage value
Particulars Year Amount ($)
Cash outflow 0 -40000
Cash inflow 1 10000
2 10000
3 10000
4 10000
5 10000
6 22000
IRR 17%
using IRR function in excel.
If you are a girl the media expects you to be girly and like shopping and putting on makeup, some girls hate that stuff
Answer:
4. the normal process of jobs being created and destroyed.
Explanation:
Frictional unemployment is unemployment that is related to switching of jobs also called transitional unemployment. It occurs when workers leave jobs and get jobs as a result of normal labor tunover in a healthy economy.
In a growing economy frictional unemployment is the lowest type of employment bad there are abundant opportunities for workers.
Quitting a job is a voluntary type of frictional unemployment, while when an employee bis fired it is involuntary type of frictional unemployment.
Answer:
The correct answer is $2,610.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
We can calculate the the direct labor cost by using following formula:-
Direct labor hour required= Estimated production × Direct labor hour
= 870 × 1÷4 =217.5 hours
Direct labor cost = Direct required labor hour × Rate of labor per hour
= 217.5 hours × $12
= $2,610
According to the analysis, $2,610 is the total amount to be budgeted for direct labor.
Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.
