1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grigory [225]
3 years ago
12

Is it a violation of the U.S Constitution for a defense attorney to not cross-examine the witness?

Law
1 answer:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Sixth Amendment provides that a person accused of a crime has the right to confront a witness against him or her in a criminal action.  This includes the right to be present at the trial (which is guaranteed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 43). As well as the right to cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The table summarizes the educational degrees of four applicants. There are three jobs open in this career cluster including Poli
Contact [7]

Answer: Applicants 2 and 4 are qualified to be Arbitrators, Applicants 1 and 4 are qualified to be Legal Assistants, and Applicant 3 is qualified to be a Police Detective.

Explanation: Some arbitrator roles require a law degree, but many do not. Most, however, do require a bachelor's degree.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give your own example of the 5th Amendment.
Verdich [7]

Answer: say if u were going to court and ur were being prosucuted and u felt like there making u say something ur nor trying to say u can ask for an attorney

Explanation:

The Fifth Amendment creates a number of rights relevant to both criminal and civil legal proceedings.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In North Korea, What part of the economy does the government regulate?
DerKrebs [107]

Answer: The economy of North Korea is a centrally planned system, where the role of market allocation schemes is limited, though increasing. As of 2015 North Korea continues its basic adherence to a centralized command economy.

Country group: Low-income economy

Currency: North Korean won

GDP by sector: agriculture: 22.5%; industry: 47...

GDP per capita rank: 178th (nominal, 2017); 1...

5 0
3 years ago
PLS HURRY What countries were allied in World War I and opposed in World War II? Russia and Germany Germany and Britain France a
Dovator [93]

Answer:

The Allies of World War I or Entente Powers were a coalition of countries led by France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the United States against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria, and their colonies during the First World War (1914–1918).

By the end of the first decade of the 20th century, the major European powers were divided between the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance. The Triple Entente was made up of France, Britain, and Russia. The Triple Alliance was originally composed of Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Italy, but Italy remained neutral in 1914. As the war progressed, each coalition added new members. Japan joined the Entente in 1914 and after proclaiming its neutrality at the beginning of the war, Italy also joined the Entente in 1915. The term "Allies" became more widely used than "Entente", although the Principal Allies of France, Britain, Russia, Italy, and Japan were sometimes known also as Quintuple Entente.[1] The colonies administered by the countries that fought for the allies were also part of the Entente Powers such as British India, French Indochina, and Japanese Korea.

The United States joined in 1917 (the same year in which Russia withdrew from the conflict) as an "associated power" rather than an official ally. Other "associated members" included Serbia, Belgium, Montenegro, Asir, Nejd and Hasa, Portugal, Romania, Hejaz, Panama, Cuba, Greece, China, Siam (now Thailand), Brazil, Armenia, Luxembourg, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Haiti, Liberia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uruguay and Honduras.[2] The treaties signed at the Paris Peace Conference recognised Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan and the United States as 'the Principal Allied and Associated.

3 0
2 years ago
Baker and others entered a Wal-Mart store shortly after 3:00 A.M. by cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch. Som
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

There are enough intent and action to commit a crime.  By burglarizing the store and moving some goods to the rear door, Baker and his co-travellers have established specific intent to commit larceny.

Specific intent requires planning before the time and the predisposition to commit the act.  They have even establish general intent by actually entering the store and cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch.

Explanation:

Larceny is robbery.  The intent to commit a crime by Baker and his co-travellers is established by their actions at the crime scene.  They cannot be exonerated because they have not yet taken the goods away from the store.  But, it can be established that the intent exists merely by their presence at the crime scene at such an hour of the morning.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If party is unhappy with the decision handed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, what is their next step?
    12·1 answer
  • Class or individual Evidence?
    8·2 answers
  • Perhaps the aspect of internal investigation that has instigated the greatest amount
    14·1 answer
  • 4) This is a crime of creating or altering a document in order to defraud another person, persons, or business.
    10·1 answer
  • 10. What is lobbying?
    6·2 answers
  • Vhat made Alexander Maconochie a good judge of prison life?
    10·1 answer
  • What drugs are commonly abused?​
    15·2 answers
  • In the Legal Language, what is double jeopardy?
    9·2 answers
  • Who is the current chief justice of the united states supreme court?.
    5·1 answer
  • To meet the standard for the duty of care, a person must:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!