Question Completion:
1. Was the contract a bilateral or a unilateral contract?
2. Does Chenard win?
3. Is it ethical for Marcel Motors to refuse to give the automobile to Chenard?
Answer:
Chenard v. Marcel Motors, 387 A.2d 596, 1978 Me. Lexis 911 (Maine 1978)
1. A unilateral contract existed when Marcel Motors made the offer to any golfer who shot a hole-in-one for a new 1974 Dodge Colt.
2. Chenard wins. Marcel Motors is obliged to supply him with the new 1974 Dodge Colt as promised because Chenard completed the stated task by shooting a hole-in-one. Chenard wins, not because of his fee or participation in the golf tournament, he wins because Marcel Motors is obliged to fulfill its promise.
3. It is not ethical for Marcel Motors to refuse to give the automobile to Chenard. It was not forced to make the promise. No excuse, including illegality under gambling, could not exonerate it from its obligation to fulfill its promise.
Explanation:
According to the law, a unilateral contract is a contract agreement in which, for example, Marcel Motors promised to offer a new 1974 Dodge Colt to a golfer after the golfer had shot a hole-in-one. In this unilateral contract, the offeror (Marcel Motors) was the only party with a contractual obligation. Unilateral contracts are primarily one-sided but remain very legal.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. In assessing the tort of defamation, the courts must seek a balance between the right to protect one's reputation with the rights afforded under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees, among other rights, the right to freedom of expression, that is, the freedom of citizens to express their opinions without censorship or punishment for it.
But this right, like all civil rights, has limits. These limits are precisely the rights of other citizens. Therefore, if a person's freedom of expression constitutes defamation, he would be violating the right of another citizen and, consequently, exceeding his powers.
Therefore, the courts must verify that there is a balance between both rights, or that the freedom of expression does not exceed what is guaranteed by the First Amendment, since otherwise a crime would be committed against the honor of the other person.
Karl Marx described a command economy as "common ownership of the means of production" in the Communist Manifesto. communism and socialism use command economies, but the two political philosophies use them in different ways.
About Karl Marx
German philosopher Karl Marx lived in the 19th century. He specialised in political ideology and was an well-known communist supporter. The Communist Manifesto & Das Kapital, both of which he co-wrote, served as the cornerstones of Marxism.
Marx's critiques of society, economics, & politics, generally known as Marxism, contend that class antagonism is the primary mechanism by which human societies emerge. This displays themselves in the conflict between the working classes (also known as the proletariat) who allow these means by selling their labor-power for salaries and the ruling classes (also known as the bourgeoisie) who control the means of production in the capitalist mode of production.
To know more about Karl Marx:
brainly.com/question/13742699
#SPJ4
Answer:
no
Explanation:
just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently
Answer:
Very less or often no space for creativeness or innovative inputs into the system.
Highly rigid decision making system. ...
There is a severe lack of empathy or rationality.
The origination is highly regulated by set rules and regulations.
Productivity and efficiency are achieved through standardization of processes
