Explanation:
Although the material is banned, I will keep the person in abeyance unless there is any proof against his allegations. Even if nothing is confirmed, picking such a person who is a compulsive liar would be in my own choice. I can not endanger my company and its workers by recruiting an employee who may be off - the-record suspect, if the offense is not confirmed. I comprehend that it is not legitimate to act on the prohibited information, but an act of a non-social nature is equally a ban on society, and I, as a recruiter, can not promote the same thing.
Answer:
Consider, for example, the categorical syllogism: No geese are felines. ... Clearly, “Some birds are not felines” is the conclusion of this syllogism. The major term of the syllogism is “felines” (the predicate term of its conclusion), so “No geese are felines” (the premise in which “felines” appears) is its major premise.
Explanation:
The statement that is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading is: The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.
What is protocol?
Protocol can be defined as a set of guideline or policy that is expected of a person or an individual to follow or abide by.
Since parents or students have the right to ask that a school correct education records in which they tend to believe to be inaccurate or misleading. The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading.
Learn more about protocol here:brainly.com/question/5660386
#SPJ1
Answer:
It was a part of the spoils system also known as political patronage. They would be called political patrons.
Answer and Explanation:
The 14th amendment cannot be a violation of the concept of federalism, as federalism is in accordance with the concepts covered in the Bill of Rights and only allows for the separation and sharing of powers between state and federal governments if this does not hurt the concepts covered by the Bill of Rights. These concepts are strengthened with the 14th amendment and for this reason, we should not consider that this amendment could harm the concept of federalism.
The ability of a state to create its own laws must be maintained even if people can move from one state to another, because this allows states to organize and maintain order in their territories, independent of their inhabitants. In this case, the individual who is moving from state to state must adapt to the laws of the territory, so that he/she can remain in the place.
