The United States supported forces fighting against Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, even though the United States wasn't directly involved in the conflict.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Proxy wars can also have an enormous effect, particularly in the locality. However, thousands of unexploded bombs have been killing in the battle since the war had ended in Cambodia and Laos, not just in Vietnam.
Khmer Rouge, a socialist party headed by the Pol Pot who ruled Cambodia following its 1975 success in the Cambodian Civil War, committed the ethnic cleansing of Cambodia that killed between 1.5 and 2 million people, representing almost 25% of the Cambodian population.
It is claimed that, during the Cambodian-Vietnam War, the US The United States trained and equipped the Khmer Rouge directly to destroy Vietnam and the Ussr influence in Southeast Asia.
There's no reason to think that, even after 1979, when the Khmer Rouge was mostly ousted by Vietnam and governed a small part of the country, the United States encouraged the government of China to provide military training and support to the Khmer Rouges, and that America voted for a Khmer Rouge to continue the country's official member at UN.
Not only is it the purchase of about 40% of America, it also helped grounds to on-go our advancement as a civilization.
<span>Religious beliefs have
highly influenced the political and hierarchical structures in both Ottoman and
Safavid Persia empires. Although both states were of Islamic religion, they
belonged to different branches, Sunni and Shia. These branches differ over the
choice of Muhammad's successor, which subsequently acquired broader political
significance, as well as theological and juridical dimensions. Sunni Muslims
believed that Muhammad didn’t clearly appoint a successor, which is why there
isn’t hereditary succession law in Ottoman Empire. This contrasts with the Shia
Muslims view, which holds that Muhammad appointed his son-in-law and cousin Ali
ibn Abi Talib to succeed him. They believed that the empire should be led by
direct successor of Muhammad’s line. Differences between these two branches
affected the politics, as Shia Muslims weren’t religiously tolerant to other
confessions and considered them for heretics, even the other branches of Islam.
This resulted in the besieged of Bagdad, which was followed by the massacre of
a large part of its Sunni Muslim inhabitants, as it was endeavored to transform
Baghdad into a purely Shiite city. The besiege of Bagdad was the event that led
to the Ottoman-Safavid war (1623–1639).</span>
its d. the delian league was formed between athens, sparta to fund each other in case of persian attacks, nothing to do with solon
