You would raise your voice to the person you are speaking to. You could also drop the volume of your voice when you say ‘I thought we were friends.’ Also really exaggerate the ‘were’ to show you were friends like in the past
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the landmark supreme court ruling sanctioned racial segregation.
<h3>What is the impact of Plessy v Ferguson?</h3>
Plessy V Ferguson established separate but equal provisions also known as segregation as constitutional.
The case established this principle of segregation until it was overturned in 1954.
Therefore, C is the correct option.
Learn more about the Plessy v. Ferguson here:
brainly.com/question/13322557
#SPJ1
Answer:
D- People can decrease their carbon footprint by reducing the amount of energy they use.
Explanation:
I just took the test.
International Monetary Fund (IMF)-an organization of 189 countries, that work to foster global monetary cooperation, facilitate international trade, secure financial stability and reduce poverty around the world
The World trade organization (WTO)-is the only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations
