Succeed and get paid more.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Para nosotros, la familia es la célula principal de la sociedad, es donde se aprenden los valores y la práctica de éstos constituye la base para el desarrollo y progreso de la sociedad. Es, quizá, el único espacio donde nos sentimos confiados, plenos; es el refugio donde nos aceptan y festejan por los que somos, sin importar la condición económica, cultural, intelectual, religión a profesar o preferencia sexual. La familia nos cobija, apoya, nos ama y respeta.
Answer: The first one is Benito Mussolini
Explanation: And, I can't figure out the rest because of how you worded it or how you pasted it.
Henry Ford first used what was common in other industrial factories in his own. He created a perfect assembly line where a car was manufactured in just under 90 minutes instead of the usual 13 hours. This perfection in manufacturing meant that no time was to go wasted, this meant that workers were a psrt of a single aspect in the assembly line instead of doing 2 or 3 jobs within production. He created a complex system of trolleys and slides that helped with this purpose of maximizing efficiency. The mass production meant that they could sell more cars and keep their prices down and increasing profits at the same time. He created cars not only with mass production in mind but also with mass consumption. Henry Ford wanted everybody to own a car, not just the little upper rich class.
