1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Usimov [2.4K]
3 years ago
12

Miguel is interested in voting in a local election that will choose new officials in his community. Which of the following issue

s would most likely be affected by his vote?
A.
whether a Supreme Court justice is nominated
B.
how the state budget is determined in the future
C.
what new laws will be discussed in the US Congress
D.
how money is spent on a new bus system in the city
Social Studies
2 answers:
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<em>D "</em><u><em>how money is spent on a new bus system in the city</em></u><em>"</em>

Explanation:

Phoenix [80]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

It is local also.

You might be interested in
If you were a member of the Brahmin caste, how would you react to Buddha's teachings? Why?
True [87]
Buddha denounced the caste system and taught that a person's actions are the measure of who a person is, whether a priest or outcast. He denounced the authority of Brahmin priests, their scripture and their rituals. He welcomed outcasts and some of the greatest tantric adepts were from the lowest caste (buddhanet.net).
5 0
3 years ago
Which territory saw a rise in violent clashes between pro- and antislavery sides in the 1850s
Anika [276]
The answer should be Kansas.
6 0
3 years ago
How did Mesoamerica’s environment challenge farmers?
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
Lack of usable land, and poor conditions of soil
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
describe historical, social, political, and economic processes producing diversity, equality, and structured inequalities in the
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

Rising inequality is one of our most pressing social concerns. And it is not simply that some are advantaged while others are not, but that structures of inequality are self-reinforcing and cumulative; they become durable. The societal arrangements that in the past have produced more equal economic outcomes and social opportunities – such as expanded mass education, access to social citizenship and its benefits, and wealth redistribution – have often been attenuated and supplanted by processes that are instead inequality-inducing. This issue of Dædalus draws on a wide range of expertise to better understand and examine how economic conditions are linked, across time and levels of analysis, to other social, psychological, political, and cultural processes that can either counteract or reinforce durable inequalities.  

Inequality Generation & Persistence as Multidimensional Processes: An Interdisciplinary Agenda  

The Rise of Opportunity Markets: How Did It Happen & What Can We Do?  

We describe the rise of “opportunity markets” that allow well-off parents to buy opportunity for their children. Although parents cannot directly buy a middle-class outcome for their children, they can buy opportunity indirectly through advantaged access to the schools, neighborhoods, and information that create merit and raise the probability of a middle-class outcome. The rise of opportunity markets happened so gradually that the country has seemingly forgotten that opportunity was not always sold on the market. If the United States were to recommit to equalizing opportunities, this could be pursued by dismantling opportunity markets, by providing low-income parents with the means to participate in them, or by allocating educational opportunities via separate competitions among parents of similar means. The latter approach, which we focus upon here, would not require mobilizing support for a massive re-distributive project.  

The Difficulties of Combating Inequality in Time  

Scholars have argued that disadvantaged groups face an impossible choice in their efforts to win policies capable of diminishing inequality: whether to emphasize their sameness to or difference from the advantaged group. We analyze three cases from the 1980s and 1990s in which reformers sought to avoid that dilemma and assert groups’ sameness and difference in novel ways: in U.S. policy on biomedical research, in the European Union’s initiatives on gender equality, and in Canadian law on Indigenous rights. In each case, however, the reforms adopted ultimately reproduced the sameness/difference dilemma rather than transcended it.  

Political Inequality, “Real” Public Preferences, Historical Comparisons & Axes of Disadvantage  

The essays in this issue of Dædalus raise fascinating and urgent questions about inequality, time, and interdisciplinary research. They lead me to ask further questions about the public’s commitment to reducing inequality, the importance of political power in explaining and reducing social and economic inequities, and the possible incommensurability of activists’ and policy-makers’ vantage points or job descriptions.  

New Angles on Inequality  

The trenchant essays in this volume pose two critical questions with respect to inequality: First, what explains the eruption of nationalist, xenophobic, and far-right politics and the ability of extremists to gain a toehold in the political arena that is greater than at any time since World War II? Second, how did the social distance between the haves and have-not harden into geographic separation that makes it increasingly difficult for those attempting to secure jobs, housing, and mobility-ensuring schools to break through? The answers are insightful and unsettling, particularly when the conversation turns to an action agenda. Every move in the direction of alternatives is fraught because the histories that brought each group of victims to occupy their uncomfortable niche in the stratification order excludes some who should be included or ignores a difference that matters in favor of principles of equal treatment.  

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
quizle Romila ensures that she pays taxes out of fear that she might be caught and sent to prison for evading taxes. The given e
tatuchka [14]

Answer: the answer is Regulatory pillar

Explanation:

Quizle Romila ensures that she pays taxes out of fear that she might be caught and sent to prison for evading taxes. The given example shows the influence of regulatory pillar on people’s behavior.

The regulatory pillar is the forceful power of the government exercised through laws,regulations and rules.

Romila was influenced by the mentality of been prosecuted if she avoids paying of taxes

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would it benefit a company to restrict its supply of a product to consumers when consumer demand for the product is high? It
    14·2 answers
  • When interpreting confidence intervals when there are three or more means, if the intervals overlap such that the sample mean of
    14·1 answer
  • What type of political organization did Europe experience during the Middle Ages?
    7·2 answers
  • If all light waves are reflected off a medium, then what color will be perceived?
    15·1 answer
  • Who do the members of the us house of representatives represent?
    9·1 answer
  • Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was an activist organization in the 1960s that protested the Vietnam War, racial injusti
    13·1 answer
  • What effect did the Revenue Act of 1926 have on Americans?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the industrial Revolution change the United States politically?
    8·1 answer
  • Can somebody help me?
    10·1 answer
  • What is an example of a physical process?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!