Answer:
<em><u>Boy </u></em>code
Explanation:
The Boy Code is <em>a collection of generally non-verbal rules and boundaries that tend to characterize boyhood and masculinity in America, according to William Pollack, PhD, author of Real Boys.</em>
The Boy Code's four foundational pillars are:
- <em>The Sturdy Oak </em>- Men and Boys must not be frail. No weeping, whimpering or hurt gestures allowed.
- <em>Give ‘Em Hell</em> - Boys are considered to be extremely active risk-takers who are physically violent. Boys often learn quickly that most of their poor behavior will be brushed off as "boys will be boys."
- <em>The Big Wheel</em> - Rank and superiority are vital; it's important to try to get to the top of the rankings, regardless of the cost. There's no embarrassment.
- <em>No Sissy Stuff</em> - Feelings are the women's domain, according to the Law. Especially feelings of tenderness.
Answer: the colonists felt like the government had to much power
Explanation: they had power over everything colonists had not say in anything
Depends on the size of the county
A few months after birth or a year, seeing as twins can get so close within those few months and develop separation anxiety from their twin
Answer:
Through the diverse cases represented in this collection, we model the different functions that the civic imagination performs. For the moment, we define civic imagination as the capacity to imagine alternatives to current cultural, social, political, or economic conditions; one cannot change the world without imagining what a better world might look like.
Beyond that, the civic imagination requires and is realized through the ability to imagine the process of change, to see one’s self as a civic agent capable of making change, to feel solidarity with others whose perspectives and experiences are different than one’s own, to join a larger collective with shared interests, and to bring imaginative dimensions to real world spaces and places.
Research on the civic imagination explores the political consequences of cultural representations and the cultural roots of political participation. This definition consolidates ideas from various accounts of the public imagination, the political imagination, the radical imagination, the pragmatic imagination, creative insurgency or public fantasy.
In some cases, the civic imagination is grounded in beliefs about how the system actually works, but we have a more expansive understanding stressing the capacity to imagine alternatives, even if those alternatives tap the fantastic. Too often, focusing on contemporary problems makes it impossible to see beyond immediate constraints.
This tunnel vision perpetuates the status quo, and innovative voices —especially those from the margins — are shot down before they can be heard.
