I think is A because something that you believe in means you will change behavior you will support that belief so much were it might get to a point were you argue with people if they don't believe on that belief.
LOL idk if is right I try
Answer: A. Expressing rage over the terrible plight of drug addicts to demonstrate her intense commitment to change
Explanation: What will certainly not increase credibility with the audience is expressing rage. While it may seem that expressing rage and anger is good for showing commitment to a problem, a desire for change, and that Amy cares about reducing the suffering of drug addicts, rage shows that there is a lack of composure with Amy, and composure is key when one wants to gain credibility, because anger can point to certain shortcomings of anyone who wants credibility at all costs.
On the other hand, showing keen interests and enthusiasm for problem solving indicates dynamism, while quoting adequate sources to confirm claims and fluent speaking are elements of competence, that is, someone who has the competence to solve a problem.
Answer:
Poverty is a severe state of lacking something that is critical for living or wellbeing, such as a severe lack of food.
Effect of poverty on environmental
The demand to the environment increases as poverty drives people to turn to the environment to support them as they struggle through poverty .
Due to the lack of electricity for example people will turn to the environment to get wood for fire so that they can cook or keep themselves warm.
Others will overfish as they try to feed their families from fishing ; the depletion of all these resources have negative impact on the environment.
How does affluence affect the environment
Affluence refers having plenty of money to acquire a high standard of living .
As people get rich they become greedy and demand more those with businesses keep expanding them at the cost of demolishing the environment and their businesses are usually not environmental friendly but as long as they make money that is not taken into consideration.
The problems w efface by not including the harmful environmental costs in the prices of goods and services.
It has an effect on people understanding how much it actual costs to do damage control when the environment has been harmed or damaged.
Explanation:
I believe it’s “if something takes energy IN then it must give energy OUT. “
I hope this helped! :-)
