Answer: $27.47
Explanation:
Given: Growth rate = 4.70% per year = 0.0470 per year
Dividend of next year = $2.50
Expected rate of return on Stock = 13.80% =0.1380
Current price = (Dividend of next year ) ÷ (Expected rate - Growth rate)
= (2.50)÷ (0.1380-0.0470)
= (2.50) ÷ (0.091)
≈ $27.47
Hence, you will pay $27.47 for the company's stock today.
If a supply chain manager can reduce inventory while keeping the flow rate constant, little's law predicts flow time will go down.
Little's Law is a theorem that calculates the average number of items in a stationary queuing system based on an item's average waiting time and the average number of items arriving at the system per unit of time.
The law establishes a straightforward and obvious method for evaluating the efficiency of queuing systems.
The notion is extremely important for business operations since it states that the number of items in the queuing system is determined primarily by two essential variables and is unaffected by other factors such as service distribution or service order.
Hence, the answer is that the flow time will go down.
Learn more about supply chain:
brainly.com/question/25160870
#SPJ4
Solution :
a). The current market value of the unlevered equity
= $ 40.45 million
b). The market value of the equity one year from now is
= $ 44.5 million - $ 18 million
= $ 26.5 million
c). The expected return on the equity without the leverage = 10%
The expected return on the equity with the leverage = 
= 0.93 %
d). The lowest possible value of equity without the leverage = $20 million - $ 18 million
= $ 2 million
The lowest return on the equity without the leverage = 10%
The lowest return on the equity with the leverage = 2 % as the equity is eroded.
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
