Answer:
"Sonnet 130" details the beauty of the mistress but all in the negative way. The comparison of the features, the breath, the hair, the cheeks etc all are shown to be the worst of what they are supposed to be. All these details about the mistress pokes fun at the very essence of a sonnet form.
Explanation:
William Shakespeare's "Sonnet 130" is quite unlike the regular sonnet form. This sonnet rather demerits the beauty of the lover, while sonnets are most famous for their romantic love themes. Shakespeare's sonnet instead labels everything about the lover as the worst or in the bad light.
Sonnet 130 begins with the description of the mistress' eyes as nothing like the sun. Then he moves on to list the bad qualities of all that is seen in the mistress. He makes her features seem less ideal, demeaning their importance and significance.
Except for the last couplet <em>"And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare
/ As any she belied with false compare"</em>, the whole sonnet in itself is a parody/ satire of the sonnet form.
We left work for the day.
Answer:
Inga should adjust her argument by acknowledging that some fast food choices are not healthy, but she should also point out examples of healthier choices such as salads, grilled chicken, eggs, and yogurt that are full of nutrients for growth. She can still say that students wouldn’t waste as much food if they could choose healthy foods from familiar restaurants.
Explanation:
the sample response
Answer:
Paragraphs 14-15 of Elie Wiesel's "The peril's of indifference speech" contributed to the central idea of the text because Wiesel talks in ironic way about the holocaust in Auschwitz by saying that the government of other countries if they knew what was happening to the Jews under Hitler's ruling, would have helped them. but the world knew the situation and did nothing to avoid many deaths that occured hence the name "perils of indifference'
Explanation:
In parapraph 14-15 Wiesel's says that in those darkest times inside the death camps, they felt abandoned and forgotten and that their consolation was that they believe that Auschwitz and Trablinka were closely guarded secrets and believed that the free world leaders did not know what was going on and that if they knew in their thought, believes the leaders would have intervened. but they later found out that the leaders knew what was happening.
Elie Wiesel and his family was taken by the Nazis to the Auschwitz extermination camp and brutalized in 1944. He gave this speech "perils of indifference' at the white house in 1999 where he talked about their time in captivity and how apathy can be dangerous because himself and others felt abandoned there.
I'm confused... are you asking if this is the correct answer?
