Answer and Explanation:
The Paleolithic is more than an establishment for world history. 95% or more of all mankind's history took place in the Paleolithic.
This places into point of view not just the gigantic measure of time that people have been on the Earth and not looked like our present degree of innovation and human progress, yet it additionally stresses exactly how quickly we have built up those things and how exponential our development has been.
You may have known about the Stone Age; in some cases this term is mistakenly consolidated or conflated with the Paleolithic. Truth be told these are only two different ways of arranging human antiquarianism; the name "stone age" stresses the innovation we were utilizing, though the Paleolithic covers all parts of mankind's history and development during this time frame. One noteworthy component of innovation in this period is the way that homo sapiens didn't concoct apparatuses or the utilization of controlled flame; rather they acquired them from other primate predecessors and improved them.
While present day mankind's history is now and then associated with the creation of farming, which didn't happen until the Neolithic, there were as yet numerous rates of human improvement that we typically consider "current" which had effectively occurred in the Paleolithic. Moderately intricate social orders and dialects were creating, alongside workmanship and specialties, and conceivably cooking outside of the simmering of meat.
Another critical advancement during this period was the movement of people far and wide, and the part of the bargain Ice Age period modifying the atmosphere.
Answer:
low-context cultures; high-context cultures
Explanation:
Regarding conflict and culture, researchers have found that people in low-context cultures give greater importance to task or instrumental issues and also places greater emphasis on words spoken, while people in high-context cultures give greater importance to the expressive or emotional aspects of managing the conflict. The main aim of the latter group is to express their feeling in order to release tension and avoid any form of embarrassment.
Answer:
- Five examples that support successfulness of the competition policy of South Africa are:
1) The product choices along with its competitive prices were provided to the consumers.
2) Practices such as horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was declared unlawful in 1984.
3) Prevention of monopoly growth was the aim of the competition policy act.
4) Countries monopolies and markets were regulated by the help of this structure.
5) It benefited all the South Africans either by providing employment and by participation of small and medium enterprises balancing the act through ownership economic transformation.
Explanation:
Have a good day! Sorry if these are wrong. :)
Answer: Consumer and producer
