Answer:
In the aftermath of World War I, Germans struggled to understand their country’s uncertain future. Citizens faced poor economic conditions, skyrocketing unemployment, political instability, and profound social change. While downplaying more extreme goals, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party offered simple solutions to Germany’s problems, exploiting people’s fears, frustrations, and hopes to win broad support.
Explanation:
https://www.ushmm.org/learn/holocaust/path-to-nazi-genocide/chapter-1/aftermath-of-world-war-i-and-the-rise-of-nazism-1918-1933
Giovanni di Bicci de' Medici had a son name cosimo who was the richest man in florence and he was very interested in politics and spent large sums of his wealth in to reshape florence politiccs and was nicknamed father of his country. this obsession with politics grew until the most powerfull and wealthy medici lorenzo the magnificent who spent so much time and money on politics that their bank started to decay.
Answer:
The best explanation for this phenomenon is <u>PRIMING</u>
Explanation:
Primingcould be defined as a technique in which the introduction of one stimulus influences how people respond to a subsequent stimulus. Priming works by activating an association or representation in memory just before another stimulus or task is introduced.
Priming is the process by which perception or experience of an item (or person or event) leads to an increase in its accessibility and the accessibility of related material and behaviors. therefore priming is what happens when exposure to some thing influences the behavior of an individual later on, without that individual being aware that the first thing is guiding their behavior to a certain extent.
The person was exposed to a scary movie which latter affected his behaviour when he witnessed an argument which he probably think will end in a fight.
Answer:
D. Predictive validity
Explanation:
Predictive validity is one approach of criterion validity that predicts individual performance on some measure scores administered at a later date. The judgement of being conscientious came from an accumulated observation of the individual attendance over time which clearly illustrate predictive validity.
What are the answers??????????
