1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elza [17]
3 years ago
6

Why is it impossible from an individual to inherit a recessive condition if only one parent is a carrier for that condition

Social Studies
2 answers:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
7 0
I added a picture of a badly-drawn cross as an example to help me explain. Let's say h is the recessive allele, in this case, that would cause a recessive condition. The heterozygous Hh parent is the carrier and they are being crossed with a homozygous dominant HH parent.

As you can see, all of the children are either homozygous dominants HH or heterozygous carriers Hh. None of the children can be homozygous recessive hh because there is not a recessive allele h to inherit from the other parent. Because H is dominant over h, the recessive condition won't be displayed.

DiKsa [7]3 years ago
5 0
Since H is dominant, well more dominant than h, it won't be recessive.

Hope this helps.
You might be interested in
What were five ways that the Federalist Party and the Democratic Republic Party alike?
AnnyKZ [126]
1. Both parties engage in and benefit from gerrymandering, the practice of redrawing district lines for partisan gain.
2. Both parties also thwart efforts to combat gerrymandering, such as amendments making gerrymandering illegal and the adoption of independent redistricting commissions.
3. At the federal level, both parties benefit from congressional mandated single-member districts.
4. Both parties control the process of formally electing the president.
5. Despite consistent polling showing that voters are unhappy with their limited choice of candidates and want more options in general elections.
7 0
3 years ago
How did pro slavery supporters justify continuing the practice of slavery in the South
Brut [27]

Hello. You forgot to introduce the answer options. The options are:

A. Slaves were needed to defend plantations against invaders.

B. Slavery boosted the reputations of Southern landowners.

C. Slaves could be traded with other nations for money.

D. Slavery helped slave families stay together on plantations.

E. Slaves were required to grow crops on plantations.

Answer:

E. Slaves were required to grow crops on plantations.

Explanation:

Pro-slavery Americans claimed that slaves were essential to the supply of agricultural products in the country. This is because it was the slaves who did the whole process of sowing, maintaining, harvesting, processing and distributing agricultural products from southern crops. These people who defended slavery, claimed that freeing the slaves would dissolve all this labor and block the productivity of the national agricultural sector.

3 0
3 years ago
Will mark the BRAINLIEST answer if its correct! Please, don't just guess...
VashaNatasha [74]

The answer would be A

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The _____ increases the authority of the institutions of the European Union and is designed to accommodate the changes brought a
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

Amsterdam Treaty

Explanation:

The Amsterdam Treaty was signed on 2 October 1997 according to which the Member States decided to engage in broad policy and institutional changes. The Treaty authorized member states to increase certain powers from national governments to the European Parliament, covering diverse issues like legislating on foreign and security policy, adopting civil and criminal laws and immigration laws. It paved the way for implementing institutional changes to accommodate its expansion because of the new member nations joining the EU.

5 0
3 years ago
In the context of the contingency model, which of the following is the most powerful element of situational favorability?
DanielleElmas [232]

Answer: Option (D)

Explanation:

The contingency model given by the psychologist Fred Fiedler is referred to as the contingency theory that is mainly involved with efficacy  and performance of a leader in a business or an organization.  Under this theory of leadership, it is stated that the organization leader’s efficacy is mostly contingent upon the circumstances i.e. how their leadership approach tends to match to these circumstances.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is NOT true about religious divisions after the Reformation? * most of Northern Europe become Protestant most of Southern
    7·1 answer
  • A child gives her friend a piece of cake, in hopes that when she forgets her snack one day, her friend will reciprocate the favo
    12·1 answer
  • What does the science of human development seek to understand?
    7·2 answers
  • What is anecdotal evidence?
    6·2 answers
  • The expressed congregational power to regulate commerce implies that Congress may _______.
    9·2 answers
  • Nepal is the country of geographical diversity .justify this statement with examples<br>​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the leading cause of preventable death in high school athletics?
    9·1 answer
  • Que fué del sacro imperio romano germánico​
    6·1 answer
  • Native American people had been living on the land that became known as the Midwest for many years before Europeans arrived. Wha
    9·1 answer
  • Which researcher believed that social interaction is the basis of language acquisition and development? believed that social int
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!