Question

Jim was a mechanic. One day when he attempted to weld a car's gasoline tank, it exploded and he was hurt. He filed to collect workers' compensation. His employer resisted on grounds that Jim had been negligent and had also violated the express regulations of the company when he attempted to weld a gasoline tank. Which statement is correct?
A.

Jim cannot recover if it is shown that his negligent conduct caused the explosion.


B.

Jim cannot recover if it is shown that he violated the express regulations of his employer.


C.

Workers' compensation doesn't apply in situations like this.


D.

Jim can recover even if he was negligent and violated the employer's rules.

Answer 1

Jim can recover even if he was negligent and violated the employer's rules.

Option D is correct.

Explanation:

Employee compensation is a system that is publicly sponsored and pays financial benefits to employees who are injured during their work. The coverage of the employee is an insurance form that provides compensation for accidents or handicaps suffered by its employees.

The workers ' compensation act guaranteed that all employees injured at work received daily insurance and paid for hospital costs. By return, disabled workers earned the right to sue their bosses and supervisors for wrongdoing and earned the right to claim damages for pain and misery.

The payment for employees is basically a scheme of no consequence if the wounded employee is not at issue with the negligence of its own responsibility or the misconduct of his or her boss or friends, but only for his or her labor-related injuries is included in the injured workplace.