Answer:
a. 0.60
Explanation:
The formula to compute the price elasticity of supply using the midpoint formula is shown below:
= (change in quantity supplied ÷ average of quantity supplied) ÷ (percentage change in price ÷ average of price)
where,
Change in quantity supplied is
= Q2 - Q1
= 30 - 20
= 10
And, average of quantity supplied is
= (30 + 20) ÷ 2
= 25
Change in price is
= P2 - P1
= $20 - $10
= $10
And, average of price is
= ($20 + $10) ÷ 2
= 15
So, after solving this, the price elasticity of supply is 0.60
This best describes <span>escalation of commitment.</span>
Answer:
Considering the allocate fixed cost, it would not be a good option.
It will generate a financial disadvantage of 22,950
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&produce&buy&Differential\\Purchase&&282,600&-282,600\\Variable Cost&270,000&&270,000\\Fixed Cost&68,400&32,850&-35,550\\Total Cost&338,400&315,450&-22,950\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26produce%26buy%26Differential%5C%5CPurchase%26%26282%2C600%26-282%2C600%5C%5CVariable%20Cost%26270%2C000%26%26270%2C000%5C%5CFixed%20Cost%2668%2C400%2632%2C850%26-35%2C550%5C%5CTotal%20Cost%26338%2C400%26315%2C450%26-22%2C950%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Fixed overhead; 38 x 1800 = 68,400
There is a portion of 35,550 fixed cost which is tracable to the real wheel assembly line thus, will be eliminated.
But 32,850 would not.
Considering this, it would not be a good option to stop the assembly line and purchase the component
Answer:
$129,000
Explanation:
The indirect method fir calculating cash flows generally starts with net income and then adds or subtracts depending on the non-cash revenue or expense accounts. I.e. it starts at the end and comes back.
In this case, we are starting with net income and we need to add or subtract the changes in accounts receivable. Since accounts receivable decreased during the year it means that more money was collected increasing the cash flow.
Cash flow = net income + change in accounts receivable = $120,000 + ($40,000 - $31,000) = $120,000 + $9,000 = $129,000