The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Answer: debate each other about bills that have made it to the floor
Explanation: The senate and house of representative are two different chambers which form the bicameral legislature of most federal governments. In the United States, the both form the bicameral legislature called the United States congress. They can sit and deliberate on sub-committees to determine the final wordings and content of a bill. They can also amend bill that goes to committee. Also, they can propose legislation and vote against it due to amendment that the subcommittee have attached to it.
However, they do not debate each other regarding bills that have made it to the floor of the house.
Hey Seoul is the capital of South Korea.
<span>I believe the answer is: Mr. Jones had signed an authorization to disclose the information for the test results and the result should be given to the health department.
By making this authorization, Mr. Jones has given Dr. Marks with the right to handle the information regarding his personal test as long as its within the scope of health department database. This would take out all the legal grounds that Jones could use to sue Dr. Marks.</span>
