1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lukranit [14]
3 years ago
10

What did president Kennedy decide to do to increase jobs ?

History
1 answer:
Shtirlitz [24]3 years ago
5 0

JOHN F. KENNEDY ON THE ECONOMY AND TAXES

JFK never forgot that he had been elected in 1960 by one of the smallest popular vote margins in US history. The next presidential election was never far from his mind—and seemed to preoccupy his brother Bobby. When liberal Democrats pressed him to promote progressive social programs, he would often point out that he had not won a mandate and remind them that he first had to be reelected.

Kennedy had campaigned on the slogan of “getting America moving again” (which the Nixon campaign staff had privately derided as the peristalsis plan). But, recovery from the 1958 recession had been very sluggish and unemployment remained perilously high—6.8% just after he took office. The Council of Economic Advisers urged him to attack unemployment with New Deal style spending but the president was worried that a large deficit ($7 billion) would be politically untenable in 1964. Unemployment did fall modestly, but it remained stagnant at nearly 6% well into 1963. The fact was that the New Frontier had been preoccupied with foreign affairs for three years and once the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was ratified, JFK realized that it was time to turn to the economy. The 1964 election was barely a year away and likely to be fought against an articulate economic conservative, Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona.

In addition, JFK’s relationship with the business community had been uneasy from the start. His very public 1961 dispute with US Steel president Roger Blough over an increase in steel prices had reinforced the business community’s suspicions of his motives. Kennedy had won the battle but lost the war—the price increase was canceled but US Steel also announced that its new plants would be built abroad. By 1962, Kennedy’s domestic political fortunes seemed bleak. Unemployment remained high and the stock market had failed to recover after losing a quarter of its value. JFK also ignored the advice of key aides and endorsed efforts to enact medical care for workers over 65 under Social Security and risked his personal prestige by addressing a nationally televised “Medicare” rally in New York. By the time of the May 20 gathering, JFK knew the bill would fail in the Senate after defections by key Democrats, leaving him frustrated, furious, and depressed.

The president finally decided that only a bold domestic program, including tax cuts, would restore his political momentum. Declaring that the absence of recession is not tantamount to economic growth, the president proposed in 1963 to cut income taxes from a range of 20-91% to 14-65% He also proposed a cut in the corporate tax rate from 52% to 47%. Ironically, economic growth expanded in 1963, and Republicans and conservative Democrats in Congress insisted that reducing taxes without corresponding spending cuts was unacceptable. Kennedy disagreed, arguing that “a rising tide lifts all boats” and that strong economic growth would not continue without lower taxes.

The battle over the tax cut and the deficit continued unabated through 1963. The House Ways and Means Committee voted a tax bill out of committee in August and the grateful president reiterated that lowering taxes was the surest path to full employment and lower deficits. Polls showed that over 60% of Americans favored the tax cuts. But, even with the public support of key business leaders like Henry Ford II and David Rockefeller, the Congressional log jam remained unbroken. JFK became increasingly convinced that domestic issues, the economy and civil rights, rather than foreign policy, would prove to be decisive in his 1964 reelection campaign.

You might be interested in
I NEED HELP PLEASE
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

American colonists resented and opposed the Quartering Act of 1765, not because it meant they had to house British soldiers in their homes, but because they were being taxed to pay for provisions and barracks for the army – a standing army that they thought was unnecessary during peacetime and an army that they feared

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is believed to be the correct order of migration after humans left Africa? South Asia, Europe, the Americas the Americas, S
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

The Americas, Australia, South Asia, and Europe.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best describes supply? the amount demanded at a specific price the amount supplied at a specific price tr
olga nikolaevna [1]

Explanation:

If the price is good the supply is good if good cost than the supply increases

3 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the Earth’s revolution and moon’s revolution
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer: well the earths revolution can change the  tempurature and thee earth tilts on its axis so it rotates around the sun, the moon is different because it produces tides aligned with the gravitational pull, the moon also orbits the sun. They both however are in the same galaxy, have very similur rocks, and the composition of the Moon is much like Earth.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What are the goals of all terroists groups regardless of ideology
Elan Coil [88]

Even though it's quite difficult to define a common/global definition of terrorism and the main goals or motivations behind terrorist groups' plans; it has been found that regardless of the terrorist groups' ideology most of them are mainly moved by the intention of Frightening people into submission, achieving social and political changes, and destroying governments and creating anarchy.

Frightening people into submission:  In order to undermine governments/states control, terrorist groups use intimidation as a strategy for getting people's submission. And that way it will be easier for them to control everything.  

Achieving social and political changes:

Most terrorist groups state their main purpose is to look for ways to make changes in their societies. From their perspective, the way things are in their environment tend to be wrong, and that's why they justify their violent acts. For them, the society where they come from it's in desperate urge of help in its social or political field.

Destroying governments and creating anarchy:

From terrorist groups' perspective the government that rules their countries are inefficient or inadequate, and because of this belief, they consider the best way to fix the problem is to destroy them and create anarchy.  

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why didn’t the code noir work in Haiti?
    12·1 answer
  • True or False The most common patterns of minority treatment include assimilation, segregation, subjugation, and legal protectio
    11·2 answers
  • By 1860 what percentage of white southerners owned between 10-99 slaves
    9·2 answers
  • In a RAISE response explain how a phenomenon's effect on the world effected how it was portrayed in mythology. How did the effec
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was true of the Supreme Court’s rulings concerning Progressive legislation?
    14·2 answers
  • Externalities are effects.
    15·1 answer
  • Adolph Hitler saw political opportunity in Germany because ______. Select all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • O<br> How did the friendship between George Curry and Teddy Roosevelt begin?
    6·1 answer
  • Is the Deccan Plateau suitable for settlement?
    15·1 answer
  • What two economic impacts did the 9/11 attacks have?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!