C It showed the US that the war was far from over. The coordinated attacks throughout South Korea were proof that they had not weakened the Vietcong forces. The success of the Tet Offensive was also key in weakening support for the Vietnam War in America. Americans were already deeply divided about the war. The large loss of life only helped to strengthen the argument to get out and leave the country.
Innovations in farming. The Black Plague , Magna Carta, and the crusades all helped lead to the downfall.
Answer:
Both were absolutist governors with total control of their countries
Explanation:
Now let's see each case.
Toyotomi Hideyoshi was responsible to unify Japan in the 16th century. He put an end to the power of the feudal lords and acquired the political and military position becoming the main governor of Japan. To maintain power, Hideyoshi used the force and the threat, persecuting his enemies.
Louis XIV name himself as The King Sun, and just like Hideyoshi, Louis XIV cumulated the political and social power, but in the case of him, the maintaining of the status quo was based on religion. This means that, according to Louis XIV, his power and influence came from God.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
According to Leslie Bethell in his work "Why did the Creoles lead the revolutions in Latin America?" The statement "if the creoles had one eye on their masters, they kept the other on their servants, " implies that the Creoles fully understand the delicate situation of the colonies in which every group was constantly looking for power to override one another.
The masters are the penisulares: the Spanish settlers, while the servants are the mestizos, mulattos, Africans, and other Indian groups. The Creoles wanted to gain and retain political power in the colonies.
While you didn't provide any possible sources, we can expect that biased information would be found when you would look for information from people who are involved in the situation that is being discussed. Imagine a soldier from Germany discussing his viewpoint of World War II. He would most likely give you a biased account. At least, when compared to a postwar historical analysis of that same situation.
