Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
The industrial revolution amplified food production it also had an effect on the increase of city population
Answer:
There were two major disagreements: church hierarchy and the structure of the worship service. The Puritans rejected ecclesiastical hierarchy, including bishops and archbishops. They thought that each congregation should be self-sufficient. To them, the Church of England was excessively hierarchical.
Explanation:
The physical development of the individual corresponds to the research focus of a developmental psychologist, who seeks to identify the capabilities and limitations of the human body.
<h3 /><h3>Developmental Psychology</h3>
It is defined as the study of how individuals grow and adapt to their environment and experiences across life stages. Psychologists conduct research that assists in the achievement of physical and cognitive skills that may limit an individual to having mental and physical health.
Therefore, through research related to development, it is possible to increase understanding about an individual, their motivations and needs.
The correct answer is:
Find out more information about developmental psychologist here:
brainly.com/question/5039386
In logic, arguments aren't described as true, rather, arguments are used to prove the validity of something.
