Part of the debate over rights in the 18th century involved the prerogative of kings to remove and appoint judges upon their ascension to the throne. Liberal thinkers believed that lifetime appointments would scale back the power of the king, and therefore represented social progress. If a judge was sure of his seat, he could vote according to his own judgment, despite the wishes of the king. The Whigs in Britain actually won this right, though whether it really served their cause or their government is anyone's guess.
Louis XVI was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.
<h3>Who was Louis XVI?</h3>
He was the last King of France before the fall of the monarchy during the French Revolution and was called the Citizen Louis Capet during the four months just before he was executed by guillotine.
The limited power at the local level meant that he was unable to influenced the officials at the local level of each corners to the French Kingdom.
However, he was able to deal with his limited power at the local level by bribing the local officials to carry out his policies.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Louis XVI
brainly.com/question/13565199
#SPJ1
Answer:
A! They Wanted To Make Their Country Catholic
Explanation
at the time, if you were not catholic they would torture you until you believe their beliefs
A referendum is when people from one country vote secretly on a given problem. Hope it helps and what are the given options?
Fire change peoples lives because it kept them warm in the cold weather.
