Answer:
depreciation per year: 9,000
<u>operating income: </u> 41,000
Explanation:
Q: Adjusted the records to reflect the use of the cooktop.
Under straight-line the company will recognize the same amount of depreciation over the course of the assets life. At year-end the company will adjsut for the loss in value for the asset generated for the past of time.
depreciation per year: 9,000
<u>operating income:</u>
revenues 72,000
salaries expense: (25,000)
depreciation per year: (9,000)
total 41,000
First, we take into account the benefit and cost given in the problem. The benefit, which is $2 is a dollar lesser compared to the cost that would be incurred should the business opt to produce one more roast beef. This, of course, tells us that an additional roast beef will just impose an additional $1 cost. Thus, the answer should be the last choice.
Answer:
Direct Method
Operting Activities
$1,390 Cash Collected from Services
-$7,864 Cash to rent Equipment
-$0,864 Cash to repair facilities
$24,285 Collected from customers
Financing Activities
-$0,150 Repaid Long Term
$16,797 Net Cash
Explanation:
These others activities are not included because doesn't inclulde movements of cash.
(2) Purchased new equipment costing $3,434; signed a long-term note.
Answer:
Luther Corporation
Current Ratio for 2006 is closest to:
1.1 : 1
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Total Current Assets = $144 million
Total Current Liabilities = $132 million
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities
= $144/$132
= 1.1 : 1
b) Luther Corporation's current ratio is a liquidity measure that shows Luther's ability to pay off short-term obligations worth $132 million or those due within one year with its current assets of $144 million. The ratio tells investors and analysts of Luther Corporation how Luther can use its current assets to pay off its current debts. Since Luther's current ratio is higher than 1, it is considered good, depending on the industry average. This means that Luther's current ratio of 1.1 : 1 should not be considered in isolation, but in comparison with other firms in the industry and its performance over a number of years.
