1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brrunno [24]
3 years ago
13

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.

History
1 answer:
hoa [83]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

they are now called the "Miranda Rights" that officers must declare to a person they are arresting that "anything you might say (or do) can and will be used against you in court".

it goes something like that

You might be interested in
The british policy of enforcing the writs of assistance on colonial citizens resulted in the passage of which amendment in the b
Softa [21]

Answer:

The correct answer is  the Fourth Amendment.

Explanation:

King of England George III (1738-1820) had in his American colony a great source of income thanks to the numerous customs taxes collected from them but, the colonists found different ways to work around the taxes. In front of this, King George started to impose the "<em>writs of assistance</em>" which were sort of warrants with wide scope. British officials were able to search into places were they believed contraband goods were stored or to interrogate anybody who they believed guilty of trading them. The harassment was also one of the factors that led to the American Revolution  (1776) and later on, the creation of the American Constitution.

The Fourth Amendment of the United States of America establishes:

<em>“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”</em>

7 0
3 years ago
How did Clinton contribute to the stability in the Middle East during his administration?
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Ehud Barak and Yasir Arafat.

6 0
3 years ago
After World War II, the United States offered assistance to war-torn European nations through which of the following?
vaieri [72.5K]
The best answer to this question would be (b.) The Marshall Plan. After World War II, the United States offered assistance to war-torn European nations through the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan was the aid to the Western European countries to rebuild their economic stability. This was funded by the government of the United States.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can yall help me? I will make you brainlist
klio [65]

Answer:

he Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was the first written constitution of the United States. Written in 1777 and stemming from wartime urgency, its progress was slowed by fears of central authority and extensive land claims by states. It was not ratified until March 1, 1781. Under these articles, the states remained sovereign and independent, with Congress serving as the last resort on appeal of disputes. Significantly, The Articles of Confederation named the new nation “The United States of America.” Congress was given the authority to make treaties and alliances, maintain armed forces and coin money. However, the central government lacked the ability to levy taxes and regulate commerce, issues that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 for the creation of new federal laws under The United States Constitution.

From the beginning of the American Revolution, Congress felt the need for a stronger union and a government powerful enough to defeat Great Britain. During the early years of the war this desire became a belief that the new nation must have a constitutional order appropriate to its republican character. A fear of central authority inhibited the creation of such a government, and widely shared political theory held that a republic could not adequately serve a large nation such as the United States. The legislators of a large republic would be unable to remain in touch with the people they represented, and the republic would inevitably degenerate into a tyranny. To many Americans, their union seemed to be simply a league of confederated states, and their Congress a diplomatic assemblage representing thirteen independent polities. The impetus for an effective central government lay in wartime urgency, the need for foreign recognition and aid and the growth of national feeling.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following must tribal laws NOT violate? i. Tribal constitution ii. The US Constitution iii. Citizens' rights A. i o
const2013 [10]
The answer is D all three
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Imagine that you are an educated citizen of an imperialist European nation in the 19th century. You have not yet formed a well-t
    11·1 answer
  • in 2001, President George W. Bush signed the U.S.A Parriot Act into law. What was one result of this action?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement does not explain continued hostilities between the US government and American Indians living on reservations?
    10·2 answers
  • Name some activities the Quran prohibits
    13·2 answers
  • What actions did shi huangdi take to unify china and standardized things within the emperor?
    11·1 answer
  • Which system of government is correctly paired with its description?
    6·1 answer
  • Which statment about political action committee is true
    12·1 answer
  • Evaluate the extent to which increasing interactions among societies during the period 1200 to 1450 contributed
    10·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition<br> president of the senate
    11·1 answer
  • When Confucius died his teachings were combined into what text?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!