3 years ago

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.

History

1 answer:

hoa [83]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

they are now called the "Miranda Rights" that officers must declare to a person they are arresting that "anything you might say (or do) can and will be used against you in court".

it goes something like that

You might be interested in

Use the drop-down menus to answer the questions. How many total casualties resulted from the Normandy invasion? Which country ha

Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

How many total casualties resulted from the Normandy invasion?

Explanation:

5,000 Canadian soldiers

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I WILL MAKE U BRAINLIEST!! (plz read the pic lol)

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer: Just take the evidence from the text that you are reading. I cannot see the text that I need to take the evidence.

Here: ¨According to the text¨

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

HELP PLSS!! ASAP!! I WILL GIVE U BRAINLYEST!!

Dmitry [639]

Answer:

collarado i believe

Explanation:

i don't know much about the annexation so it could be wrong.

8 0

3 years ago

Small, hair-like parts called absorb nutrients from the food in your intestines.

Andreas93 [3]

microvilli is the answer

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

According to "Introduction to Dark Romanticism: American Gothic," how does Poe’s writing distinguish his works from other Romant

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

According to "Introduction to Dark Romanticism: American Gothic," Poe’s writing distinguish his works from other Romantic authors is that "D. His themes suggest the importance of societal reform."

Here are the following choices:
A. His themes emphasize the importance of imagination.
B. His themes reveal creepy settings.
C. His themes explore human psychology.
D. His themes suggest the importance of societal reform.

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers