Answer:
The answer is negative reinforcement.
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, negative reinforcement occurs when an unpleasant stimulus is removed after a behaviour is completed. In the example, the nagging will stop once the job has been done.
Negative reinforcement has been proved to be more effective than positive reinforcement (rewards).
Well, personally I think that it is flawed: it limits the inflow of new ideas into politics.
I think that one way to address it is to abolish the electoral college and introduce country-wide representative elections and not a "winner takes it all" system.
I believe the answer is: 80
The formula that commonly used to predict a person's IQ is:
MA/<span>CA x 100
</span>
*MA = Mental age
CA = Chronological Age
So, the the calculation of Jordan's iq would be:
MA/CA x 100
= 8/10 x 100
= 80
Hiya,
A strong Central government is bad because if the government releases a law that just so happens to be bad, it will apply to everyone and this could be horrible for the whole country. If state decisions are bad, it won't hurt the whole nation but only that said state. People fear a strong Central government might even overpower small state governments and lose independence.
Now the trouble with a limited government is that it takes time to make decisions and fraud can easily happen. With a limited government there is also limited happiness.
A solution to this would be to just have a little bit of both. Limited government can increase fairness and give more freedom and power to their people and kick out the terrible leaders whereas a strong central government you can also have the security and freedom.
Hope this helps, government was never fun tbh.
