Answer: Relevant information collection
Explanation:
In marketing research technique,gathering of information, data and facts related with the marketing field to obtain knowledge about certain topic is known as information collection.It helps in evaluating the result, solution to any problem, pursuing any research etc to increase profit, sales and marketing.
According to the question, Greg is involved in collection of relevant information regarding the copper furnishing requirement by the designers so that he can work accordingly to gain more profit ans improve sales by working as per their requirements.So, he is inquiring about the actual and related information by communicating with designers..
Answer:
The scene is stormy and violent and full of raw emotion.
Explanation:
Géricault's masterpiece, Raft of the Medusa, fits the definition of sublime because the scene is stormy and violent and full of raw emotion. The composition is based on diagonal lines the subject matter is political the scene is stormy and violent and full of raw emotion the human figures are twisted and distorted.
If he is especially pleased when mexico wins and the mexican flag is waved. he feels pride in his country and in its heritage. the term that sociologists would probably employ to explain his reactions is: nationalism.
<h3>What is nationalism?</h3>
Nationalism can be defined as the way in which a person tend to cherish or love their nation more than other nations and this person tend to have the best interest of their nation at mind.
Based on the scenario the reaction that was display by juan is nationalism based on the fact that he often feels pride in his country and in its heritage.
Therefore this is an example of nationalism.
Learn more about nationalism here:brainly.com/question/25702229
#SPJ1
Answer:
Proximate cause
Explanation:
As it relates to law, proximate cause refers to something or an event that happened that causes some things or another event to occur. The court can deem an event to have been the actually cause of an injury even though the injury didn't occur at the place of the injury. In other words, the injury might not have happened if the event or action didn't happen; the event might not be a sufficient condition for the injury to occur, but it is a necessary condition.
