Perimeter = (length+width) x 2
Let w units be the width of the rectangle.
Length of the rectangle = 2w
Perimeter:
(2w+w) x 2 = 60
(3w)2 = 60
6w = 60
w = 10
Area:
2(10) x 10
= 20 x 10
= 200 units
Answer:
linear equation
Step-by-step explanation:
it is because x has degree 1.
degree 2:- quadratic
,,. 3:- cubic
,,. 4:- bi quadratic
please follow me...my account dp is my mom's...my name is SAYAN..I am boy...
Answer:
271 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
15.95+0.92 x=265.27
0.92 x=265.27-15.95
.92 x=249.32
x=24932/92=271
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
