Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. H0: μ ≤ 104 Ha: μ > 104
Assuming the data leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, we would conclude that there is no sufficient statistical evidence to prove that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month.
b. The type error in this situation would be rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Rejecting the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it was actually true.
c. Type II error in this case would be failing to reject the null when it is false. Failing to reject the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it is actually not true.
The consequences for these errors might be disastrous including sueing of the accuser party etc.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You don't specify what you're supposed to do, so I'll make an educated guess.
Given the sequence f(1) = 4, f(n) = f(n − 1) + 11, find the first 5 terms:
f(1) = 4
f(2) = f(2 - 1) + 11 = f(1) + 11 = 4 + 11 = 15
f(3) = f(2) + 11 = 15 + 11 = 26
f(4) = f(3) + 11 = 26 + 11 = 37
f(5) = 37 + 11 = 48
Looks like you going to summer school
Answer: Like the angles BAC (56°) and BDC has the same arc BC in the circumference, these angles must be congruent, then angle BDC must be equal to 56°.
The answer would be 18
Hope that helps.
