<u>Answer:
</u>
Yes, the court should grant the motion to suppress as the police had searched for and taken into custody the marijuana bricks without having a search warrant.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- For the action carried out by the police to be deemed as lawful, the police should have a warrant issued by the magistrate.
- An operation carried out by the police in private property without a warrant is considered as a breach of rights of the individual and can be used against the police.
- Any property taken into custody by the police without a search warrant can be asked to be suppressed by the defendant.
Answer:
The answer is the implicit-association test.
Explanation:
The implicit-association test refers to a measure used in social psychology to detect the power that a person's subconscious has to associate the different mental representations of objects that occur in memory. It is mainly used to evaluate implicit stereotypes regarding test subjects.
The test's format has many uses and it has served as a tool to investigate biases related to racial groups, gender, sexuality among others. The implicit-association test was established by Anthony Greenwald, Debbie McGhee, as well as Jordan Schwartz in 1998. This test is usually utilized in many aspects referring to social psychology research.
C? Don't hate me if I'm wrong. I'm not like a history teacher of anything.
Answer:
In this scenario, Jeremy defined depression using a:
d) operational definition.
Explanation:
Operational definition is simply the way a researcher decides to define and measure something. In this case, Jeremy has a certain definition of depression that includes specific behaviors: panic attacks, hunger, and headaches. By measuring those behaviors, he determines whether participants are depressed or not. Another researcher could have a different operational definition for depression and measure, instead, how often in the past 6 months the participants have displayed anger or shown low energy levels, for example.
The term that aristotle used to refer to using evidence and reasoning to reach a conclusion is<u> "logos".</u>
Logos (Logical) implies influencing by the utilization of thinking. This will be the most imperative strategy we will study, and Aristotle's top choice. We'll take a gander at deductive and inductive thinking, and examine what makes a viable, powerful motivation to back up your cases. Giving reasons is the core of argumentation, and can't be accentuated enough. We'll think about the kinds of help you can use to substantiate your proposition, and take a gander at a portion of the regular coherent errors, keeping in mind the end goal to maintain a strategic distance from them in your composition.
