Answer: This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.
For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.
Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.
There is a lot of room for research in this area.
1, Comparing the composition of the crust to other bodies in the solar system
2. By studying things from Earths layers that have been pushed up through the cracks of the crust.
3.By measuring diffrent kinds of vibration from earthquakes
3.By doing laboratory expirements
I HOPE THIS HELPS YOUU!!!!!
Unopposed they would be running against the same party
The statement is true that in 1999, there was a limit on the amount of earning subject to the Social Security tax. The earnings that was subject to the Social Security tax in that year was $72,600.00. The goal was to maintain the relationship between preretirement earnings and benefits as well as wage rise.
