Answer:
Y = 300
government multiplier 2
output demanded increase by 20
If income tax is applied:
Y = 272.72
multipliers: 2.253775
increase 22.53775 billons
As disclosure it has a larget effect when the income tax is levied based on income rather than a flat rate.
Explanation:
DI = Y - 100
C = 30 + 0.6(Y - 100)
C = 30 - 60 + 0.6Y
C = 0.6Y - 30
Y = C + G + I
Y = (0.6Y -30) + 120 + 30
Y = 120 / 0.4 = 300
C = (0.6)300 - 30 = 150
With C we solve for the multiplier:
150/300 = 0.5
1 / (1 - 0.5) = 2
10 x 2 = 20
If variable that:
C = 30 + 0.6 (0.75Y)
C = 30 + 0.45Y
Y = 0.45Y + 120 + 30
Y = 150/.55 = 272,72
C = 30 + 0.45Y = 152,72
Propensitivity to consume:
152.72/272.72 = 0,5563
multiplier:
1 (1 - PMC) = 2.253775073
10 nillon will icnrease x 2.25377 = 22.54 billons
Answer:
equivalent annual cost: 19,784.81
The investment is not economically justified as it is cheaper to pay the fines than invest in the equipment to avoid them.
Explanation:
We calcualte the PMT of a 75,000 dollars equipment at 10%
PV 75,000
time 5
rate 0.1
C $ 19,784.811
EPA fines: <u> </u><u>$ 18,500.00 </u>
differential: (1, 284.81)
In home replication strategy, knowledge flow is multi directional, while in transnational strategy, it is one-way. This statement is False.
The companies offer standardized products and exploit the parent companies knowledge through the world. Their key strategic capability basically is to transfer the home countries innovations worldwide.
An example can be taken from the German automotive industry, which uses a home replication strategy when entering new markets.
The businesses provide uniform products and make use of the parent firms' knowledge globally. Their primary strategic capability essentially consists of exporting domestic ideas to other countries.
The German auto sector, which employs a home replication strategy when entering new markets, serves as an illustration.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about Strategy here
brainly.com/question/14286438
#SPJ4