<u>In general, how do empires fall apart?</u>
<em>Most</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>common</em><em> </em><em>reasons</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>probably</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>reduction</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>wealth</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>power</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Not</em><em> </em><em>enough</em><em> </em><em>money</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>afford</em><em> </em><em>an</em><em> </em><em>army</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>mass</em><em> </em><em>poverty</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>wrong</em><em> </em><em>decisions</em><em> </em><em>made</em><em> </em><em>regarding</em><em> </em><em>policies</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>government</em>
<u>In what ways were the Han and Roman Empire</u><u>s alike? </u>
<em>They</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>alike</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>their</em><em> </em><em>similar</em><em> </em><em>military</em><em> </em><em>techniques</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>methods</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>They both had a centralized, bureaucratic government</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>oth Rome and Han established their territories through defending and fighting for their land.</em><em> </em><em>Also</em><em> </em><em>its</em><em> </em><em>worth</em><em> </em><em>mentioning</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>their</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>0</em><em>ads and defensive walls</em><em> </em><em>were</em><em> </em><em>quite</em><em> </em><em>similar</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>well</em><em>.</em>
<u>In what ways were the Han and Roman </u><u>Empires</u><u> </u><u>different</u><u>?</u>
<em>T</em><em>he Han Dynasty was based on Confucian philosophy</em><em> </em><em>while the Romans worshipped many gods and believed in strict military discipline. The Romans were more aggressive than the Chinese, who were often just as content to rely on diplomacy and foreign trade</em>
Hope this helped you, have a good day bro cya)
D, is the final answer... others are simply not plausible
Explanation:
when Aristotle speaks of the soul 'in the heart' he has in mind the heart as primary and proximate material organ of the soul, the controlling organ originally informed and activated by the soul, upon which all the other organs depend for their formation and activation by the soul. They too live, are informed and activated by the soul, but in a way that is secondary and more remote. To speak of the soul as existing 'in the heart' is not to deny it's presence in the other organs, but to indicate the primary and proximate subject it informs and activates.
Explanation:
the Buddha argues that there are no self caused in entities, and that everything dependently arises from or upon something else.
Answer:
The transition process is usually characterized by the changing and creating of institutions, particularly private enterprises; changes in the role of the state, thereby, the creation of fundamentally different governmental institutions and the promotion of private-owned enterprises, markets and independent financial . I hope this will help you