Answer:
Explanation:
Red bull engaging in sponsorship shows they are utilizing the well packaged Red bull's marketing budget. But there should be some level of caution in either co- sponsoring or being the sole sponsor for certain sports, especially sports with high risk or danger. While sponsoring stunts like Bull stratos is a good way to make high publicity for their brand (Red bull) but if something bad happens in the course of the stunts, the brand could be connected to the tragedy which would be an everlasting bad label on the company. The company might be seen as insensitive for sponsoring such a sport that involves high risk.
Red bull sponsors X-treme sports and as a results of this sponsorship their brand have enjoyed having more time of product exposure and placement because the sponsorship will give the brand more attention with the consumers.
While it is good they go on with their various sponsorships, they must also be careful on some sports or events that involves high risk.
Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
The djdjdjdjdjdjfjfjfjdndndndjdjejsjwjsjse is b
Answer:
C. personal income minus personal taxes.
