Answer:
The Guidelines for how votes are counted and who can vote is a rule, it is backed up by the constitution as a way of directing the masses.
Choosing to campaign in states with a large number of electoral votes or so called swing states is a strategy, this involves coming up with the best approach or means to win in an election. Going to such states is a big strategy towards securing victory.
Emphasizing different messages to different voter groups is another strategy, this entails telling each of the people things that are their most needs in a bid to convince them to vote for you. It is a strategy that has always worked.
Securing endorsements and large campaign contributions is a payoff, it is an aftermath of popular acceptance by the people.
Limits on sources of fundraising and campaign contributions is a rule established by the states to encourage fair play in the electoral system or process.
Explanation:
see Answer
Answer:
Follows are the responses to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
Yeah, throughout the state court they will ever sue against fraud. As base with the that State is appropriate so because the main place of work is specific budget inventory representatives Inc.
In point b:
Thomas couldn't sue for cheating at the federal court successfully, because equality in nationality would be the only conceivable way. Because as a federal problem also isn't involved, Thomas and both are comprehensive residents of Michigan weren’t diverse for this situation. The business is a resident of all its corporate headquarters and the State of formation.
In point c:
Throughout this situation, silver can claim nationality plurality, as Oklahoma's comprehensive would not be a citizen. It simple company does company in such a state doesn't render that business a citizen. However, if silver has been damaged in terms of $75,000, this failure combined with citizenship diversity would allow it to sue extensively in a federal court. This event does not tell everyone how slowly he lost, however, the facts weren't enough to make a correct judgment.
Answer:
target fixed costs is $ 420000
Explanation:
Given data
sells 2,000
sales price of $470 per unit.
product cost at $720,000
variable costs are $300,000
to find out
target fixed costs
solution
we know here product cost and variable cost
so target fixed costs is product cost - variable costs
so we put all these value to find out target fixed cost
target fixed costs = product cost - variable costs
target fixed costs = 720000 - 300000
target fixed costs is $ 420000
Answer:
c. Not accrued Disclosed.
Explanation:
The management has estimated the loss contingency of lawsuit as reasonably possible. The Contingent liability is reasonably possible then it will be disclosed in the Notes to Financial Statements and not accrued in Balance sheet. If the contingent liability is probable then the accrual needs to be made in the Balance Sheet.
