1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
3 years ago
7

Identify the correct way to cite the Occupational Outlook Handbook's "How to Become a Lawyer" web page.

English
2 answers:
murzikaleks [220]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Its C. “Highest-Paying Occupations.” Occupational Outlook Handbook. Bureau of Labor Statistics and US Department of Labor, 29 March 2015. Web. 1 May 2015.

Explanation:

I just did it on edge

kykrilka [37]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is A. "How to Become a Lawyer." Occupational Outlook Handbook. Bureau of Labor Statistics and US Department of Labor, 29 March 2012. Web. 1 May 2013.  

Explanation:

I did it on edge

You might be interested in
What effect does the use of a literary device have on the meaning of the passage
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

It explains the main point by using a comparison.

BRAINLIST PLS!

8 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
Book vs movie giving brainliest
stira [4]

Explanation:

you read books and you watch movies,

books have words.

movies have pictures and it's action.

books teach you things.

movies entertain you.

is it enough?!

7 0
3 years ago
Which of these excerpts from the poems you read is an example of personification?
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

its A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the consequences for pandora when she values curiosity over obedience
rewona [7]

she ends up bring horrible things upon the world (Old age, war, sickness and death are a few little known things lol) but she also brings hope to the world as well wen she opens the box a second time.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • had someone read the book "knots in my yo-yo string? please write a gist statement about pages 10-15.
    9·1 answer
  • Do you believe that children in the united states should have to attend school?give three reasons and explain why or why not.
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement is true? A. Spatial order is used when explaining the steps to do or make something. B. Chronological order is u
    5·2 answers
  • When the first act opens, why is Bernardo on edge?
    13·1 answer
  • If you were going to create art based upon your childhood, what would I see?
    12·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the italicized words such as barnette in the text?
    14·1 answer
  • Please identify what type of error the following sentence includes: After significant financial losses last quarter, constructio
    7·1 answer
  • What does the dialogue in this excerpt suggest about the characters
    9·1 answer
  • There are a few / a little tomatoes in the garden.RSITY
    15·1 answer
  • I'm sick of the people that Renders me sick​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!